Technology

60078 readers

3301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

216

Is it time to question the yearly release cycle for phones? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So recently I've been seeing the trend where Android OEMs such as Google, Samsung, etc. have been extending their software release times up to like five, six, and seven years after device release. Clearly, phone hardware has gotten to the point where it can support software for that long, and computers have been in that stage for a very long time. From what I can tell, the only OEM that does this currently might be Fairphone.

Edit: The battery is the thing that goes the fastest so manufacturers could just offer new batteries and that would solve a lot of the problem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I know there are rare exception, but for most phones and most people that simply is not an option.

That used to be the case but the practice was dying by 2014 and completely flatlined after 2020

Without drastic legislative changes, it will become entirely impossible and soon

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I very seriously doubt it would become entirely impossible because if it became entirely impossible on any big brand name to do so then somebody would launch a brand that specifically allowed for that. Fairphone is somewhat that way already.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As the total number user of alternative phone OS shrinks, the development of those OS becomes less and less viable. But yes, I would see phones with mid tier specs from 3 years ago charging flagship prices to fill that the spot before it becomes entirely non-viable. I think google does need there to be the appearance of competition so they don't get hit with monopoly lawsuits, but it only needs to exist, other than that they want it as fringe and clunky as possible and I think that's where we're headed.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

With things like GrapheneOS its literally never been easier. Plug your phone into the computer, go to their website, and press a couple of buttons and read a couple of instructions. And you now have an alternative operating system on your phone.

Edit: hell, simplifiedprivacy.com will literally do it for you and send you the device.