this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
308 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3025 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Wait, why would the response to the "woke left" cancelling Dr Seuss be to... Cancel his book?

Help me try to understand.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, see you made a mistake in step one by expecting Republicans to use logic.

Basically the timeline near as I can tell is, first the publishing company decided to stop printing and distributing a number of books. This was their own internal decision not prompted by anyone outside the company. Second Fox News invented a story from whole cloth about "the woke left" banning those books. This of course got all the talibangicals in a lather and so they decided to "retaliate" by banning "woke" books. The fatal flaw of course being that they can't actually define what "woke" is so that just flailed randomly against some minority groups. Because of the broad and ambiguous language they inevitably ended up banning a bunch of Dr. Seuss books.

Said another way:

MAGA used *ism against The Woke.

MAGA is confused.

MAGA hurt itself in its confusion.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Stop expecting republicans, or fascists in general, to be internally consistent. It's all about feelings and making the base mad as hell so they don't actually use the 3 braincells they have to realize what's going on.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Two separate issues with different Seuss books.

IIRC Dr. Seuss was "canceled" because one of his books (And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street) contained a racist caricature of Asian people. And apparently a few others, according to the article, for similar reasons. But these books weren't banned per se, the publisher voluntarily opted to stop printing them.

The book in this article (Wacky Wednesday) is being banned from public schools in Tennessee because it contains an illustration of a kid's naked butt, which does violate a Republican-drafted law for content inappropriate for children.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I always did find it strange for a child's bottom to be displayed on sun lotion bottles, but I wonder if that got banned as well? Can't remember the brand, but if I remember correctly it was a child on the beach covered in a towel and a puppy or something was pulling it away from them. It was around for years.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The brand was Coppertone. They seem to have changed the girl's suit to a onepiece that stretches without revealing anything.

Thanks for confirming I wasnt just imaging something

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

It wasn't even canceled. His estate pulled the books themselves, 6 of them. If I find something I said earlier in life I don't agree with (extremely easy because I used to be religious and in a cult, now neither) then have I been canceled by the radical left? (I mean, I am far more left, but not sure I qualify for radical).