this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
338 points (94.2% liked)

Science Memes

11081 readers
2623 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gjoel@programming.dev 60 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Is no one going to comment on the "magnified five times under a microscope"? Five times? What kind of weak, low refraction plastic lens, cost of bubblegum microscope are you using to magnify your enormous monster ants?

[–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Considering the size of an ant and the picture, I'd say at least 50x

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

What is this, a magnification for ants?

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 3 points 2 weeks ago

400x is more than enough to see and differentiate eukaryotic cells so I feel like 50x might be a slight overshot

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

At first I thought 5 orders of magnitude, but 10,000x is way off. The closest I can reckon is they mean "magnified 100% five times", i.e. 2⁵, or 32x, which seems like it could be right.

[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 1 points 2 weeks ago

Browsing on a 32" monitor, "I wonder how they handle cat-sized ants where ever that's from".