this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
443 points (99.6% liked)

News

23284 readers
3431 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

People would typically pay $2,500 to the scheme's fixer, who would bribe test officials and have proxies take their certification tests, prosecutors said.

Five people have been charged in Texas with organizing and participating in an illegal cheating scheme that certified more than 200 unqualified teachers and helped the plot’s “kingpin” rake in more than $1 million, prosecutors said. 

In the scheme, people would typically pay $2,500 to have proxies take certification tests for them at two testing centers in Houston. The scandal involved bribing a testing proctor to allow test applicants and their proxies to switch places, Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg said at a news conference Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

When you don’t pay teachers what they are worth, this is what you are left with applying for these jobs.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Texas needs to do what Indiana does. Any teacher shortage gets made up by promoting unqualified substitute teachers to permanent status. That's how my daughter got a year-long substitute who did the following things, only the first of which I found out during the school year:

• She once made my daughter go out in the hall for exercising her legal right to refuse to stand up and say the pledge of allegiance (I didn't tell her not to, she just said it was stupid to say a pledge to a flag and wouldn't do it). I had to send her details about the SCOTUS case and tell her I would be getting a lawyer if it happened again. She apologized to me and lied that my daughter wasn't being punished, she just wanted to make sure my daughter was okay. My daughter, of course, never got an apology. She didn't have to say the pledge either though.

• She singled out my daughter repeatedly for being Jewish. My daughter is half-Jewish, but it really doesn't mean anything to her because it doesn't interest her. How did this teacher know? Because I am unmistakably Jewish-looking. The teacher never did anything bigoted, but she made sure to let my daughter know she was different.

• She told the kids that Joe Biden cheated to win the 2020 election. If I had found this part out, I would have marched over there in person.

What were her teaching qualifications? Why she ran a children's theater in Orange County, California!

What's she doing now? She decided that the pay was too low and is now still a teacher- at a private Christian school. I feel bad for those kids too, but they're already fucked.

[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

All the problems with none of the corruption, very efficient Indiana!

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Teacher is a bully.

I think I would have demanded a Parent-Teacher-Principal meeting in which the teacher would have cried, and the Principal would have made a formal apology to me and child. If they declined my terms, for any reason, I'd go after the school board and get real nasty muck-raking their shit out in the open.

The one thing a bully understands is a bigger, meaner bully.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I should have, but I didn't realize the extent of it. My daughter is not as talkative about this stuff as she should be no matter what happens or how much we try to convince her.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

My blood boiled on your behalf.

[–] chellewalker@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Went through the first half of your post confused; couldn't remember when Indiana Jones was ever a substitute teacher :V

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If it paid better, wouldn't more people try to bribe their way into the job? Granted, they're have more real competition for the jobs, so just getting certified might not be good enough to get a job.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

No, because if it paid more, the sector wouldn't be as flooded with middling underperformers. No joke, I knew a young lady around 10 years ago who studied education because "it's an easy degree and they help shove you through because the bar is so low. No one wants to be paid so little to do so much. But if you can make it through your first two years, it's almost impossible to fire you for anything that isn't related to sex or violence."

Her first week as an actual teacher in her own classroom with her own students, she kept posting her daily lesson notes from her whiteboard on Facebook. It only lasted a week because she got tired of everyone correcting her spelling and dates. She was a history teacher...

ETA: Don't get me wrong, I 100% support public education to the point that I've dedicated the past decade of my life to working in public education even though I find kids incredibly overwhelming. That being said, I can support something and still point out that it's broken.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That 2 year thing is not true. Maybe if you're a tenured professor, but other than that they can just choose not to renew your contract for the next year.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago

I didn't say she was smart or right. In fact, that's kinda the point. These are the types of candidates flooding interviews sometimes.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Depends a lot on how strong their union is.

Not really. The union can't force the district to renew a contract. They can only protect against firing the employee.

Schools likely won't fire teachers unless they have to because they usually have to pay out the remainder of the contract.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Public education is being eroded on purpose. Education is the last bastion of any free people.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why would middling underperformers be willing to pay $1000's for a job that pays worse than for the same job but paying more? You think that lady would have said "no, I don't want this job anymore because the pay increased"?

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

The more workers you attract, the higher your standards for hiring can be. That goes for any job, including jobs of passion. If you need to fill three positions and get three applicants willing to do them for shit pay... odds are your applicants are shit too, or they'd be going for better paid positions.

If you offer more, people with better qualifications will be interested more. You get more applicants and can be picky who you want.

As a bonus: better paid employees have more incentive to stay and do a good job to ensure they keep their position.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I get what you're saying, but the point of raising the pay is to push out the middling underperformers or motivate them to change. These are the same people who believe that lottery tickets are essentially investments because you gotta spend money to make money.

When you raise your wages across the board, you expand your hiring pool and begin attracting people who have the aptitude to be a teacher and the aspiration to get paid a decent wage. Once that starts happening and you get better performing employees, the ones who want to keep their jobs need to step up if they have been underperforming. If they don't, you replace them, plain and simple.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because the the desperation for these shit employees wouldn’t be there if career educators were able to actually afford living and staying in the sector.

Low pay means low supply means high demand means low professionalism.

But I mentioned that and the fartographer said "No".

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is what I’m wondering. Why not pay a bribe for a certification that gets you into a higher paying job?

I was thinking the catch here would be that these people were bribing their way into schools in order to teach their own weird religious creationism shit or anti LGBT whatever.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I was thinking the catch here would be that these people were bribing their way into schools in order to teach their own weird religious creationism shit or anti LGBT whatever.

That's not a catch. That would improve their hire rates for Texas school districts if they listed it on their resumes.