this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
180 points (97.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1882 readers
622 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

According to this, those making 100k (33.6% of Americans) will be getting less money. The 66.4% of Americans will be getting significantly more.

Via zippa

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 39 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

As a programmer and my wife is a doctor, I'm in the upper brackets. But I don't care. Also happy to see the millionaires losing even more money!

In my eyes, $3000 goes a long way for someone struggling!

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

Yeah, I would pay less under Trump and so would everyone in my area. The brackets that would pay less under Kamala can't afford to live here. Still a very blue area.

[–] Bsher8365@lemmy.world 23 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I am in upper brackets, too - I’m happy to pay more if someone who is struggling doesn’t have to.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Dodging taxes is unpatriotic.

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

Based and "unfunded tax cuts are theft" pilled

Sorry for the brain rot

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 4 hours ago

I think intentionally avoiding taxes should be a very serious crime. It's stealing from everyone.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

I guess I am too, maybe it’s my nouveau-ness (not that I’m anywhere near “rich”), but I don’t understand why the attitude isn’t “just go make more money”? (Keeping in mind we’re talking about people who don’t need the money for subsistence and are clearly capable of generating cash)

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

Same. Oh no I’ll have to cook at home a few more times per year. How will I survive.

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 4 points 3 hours ago

It's not losing, it's sharing.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm assuming you mean they will be getting a lower portion of the increases? The chart you have here looks more like how many people fall in a given bracket.

It makes plenty of sense to shift things to greater gains on the lower end. A while back there was a study that said somewhere around $75K was the point at which actual income gains start to level off as far as what improvements it makes to your life. At that point you can probably pay your bills and afford to eat without stressing so much over every decision. I forget if that was for a single person or what, but for where I live it would be doable to be sure. Lower than that and you need that extra boost to just meet the basic needs.

[–] Sierra_Is_Bee@beehaw.org 2 points 4 hours ago

My guess is with inflation 75K is no longer the ceiling for the amount you make before you level off as far as happiness and comfort go. Still, billionaires don't really need to exist either way. 🤷🏼‍♀️