this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
1178 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19132 readers
3997 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 68 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Where where these people of moral conscience when Bernie had a shot?

it's not like this shitshow sprung up overnight.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They voted for Hillary, because the party decided it was her turn and made everyone else drop out and endorse her.

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

That's right. And then they conveniently forgot about the following midterms.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They most likely voted for bernie

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doubtful. They're the kind of people who say that Bernie is a shitlib and controlled opposition.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

IMHO it's more like half of them. Bernie is a successful compromise between liberal and leftist voters.

Now Bernie is endorsing Harris, but if he was someone's compromise, then that compromise isn't necessarily transitive to a more centrist candidate.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I did, but most of his supporters did not follow through.

I really wouldn't bet on it.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Hey, they were having brunch.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I guarantee you that if you polled these morons they'd know next to nothing about Israel, or Palestine, their respective histories, or the conflict, or the players, or foreign policy, or the USAs influence in the region.

These people got hooked on this conflict via tiktok, probably funded by Russian propaganda machines and are too stupid to realize it.

A truly black and white, good VS evil war is actually raging right now in Ukraine, yet these morons are silent on that one. I wonder why 🤔

[–] spacesatan@leminal.space 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

A truly black and white, good VS evil war is actually raging right now in Ukraine, yet these morons are silent on that one. I wonder why 🤔

Because we're not arming the bad guys in that one genius. Russia is also a nuclear power and most people still don't think MAD is a good idea if you're suggesting we should be advocating for open warfare against russia.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you think the Israel conflict is a black and white affair then you are part of the moron group I'm talking about.

[–] spacesatan@leminal.space 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ah, so that's why you're surprised some people have a hard time supporting a candidate that wants to allow the genocide to continue.

Impossible for people to have a conscience, it must be some sort of psyop.