this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
632 points (97.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32343 readers
1158 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

pee bundled neovim add-ons might as well use helix.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You know, if I can use vim bindings and regex, I might try it out. I tend to try to keep my neovim plugins fairly lightweight when I config myself. Not being electron is a big plus.

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

yah helix has vim motions.

their search mode and select is a bit different but once you do the tutorial it makes complete sense why youd want to scope your regex replace.

[–] fl42v@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

What stopped me personally was reading they use a different order of operations, so to say. Where vim goes action + range, helix goes (or at least used to go) range + action (like replacing ci" by i"c). Mb that makes more sense for them, but I'm too lazy to re-learn that for no particular reason