Technology

37717 readers

408 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

What’s the Matter with the smart home? (www.theverge.com)

submitted 1 year ago by trashhalo@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The article discusses expectations for smart home announcements at the upcoming IFA tech show in Berlin. While companies may unveil new smart speakers, cameras and robot vacuums, the smart home remains fragmented as the Matter interoperability standard has yet to fully deliver on integrating devices. The author argues the industry needs to provide more utility than novelty by allowing different smart devices to work together seamlessly. Examples mentioned include lights notifying users of doorbell activity or a robot vacuum taking on multiple household chores autonomously. Overall, the smart home needs solutions that are essential rather than just novel if consumers are to see the value beyond the initial cool factor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is supporting this open a standard a law? It sounds like it could be an EU law, and it being one is the only reason companies would do it.

[–] TrustingZebra@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's definitely not a law. Codifying this in law could stiffle innovation.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They said that about the usbc law, but that turned out well.

[–] TrustingZebra@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the major difference is that USB-C is a much more mature standard than Matter. But even then it's not perfect.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Hm, might make sense to make a suggestion to the Commission, think it's a good idea.