this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
898 points (90.8% liked)

Political Memes

5455 readers
2333 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is there any middle ground between "not receiving 20 billion a year in weapons" and "disarmed"

The centrist mind may never know.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Is there any middle ground between “not receiving 20 billion a year in weapons” and “disarmed”

Of course there is. The US has already stopped sending certain weapons aid to Israel over the situation in Gaza.

I'll mostly ignore the childish insult, but you can do better at discussing the world like a mature adult, I'm sure.

[–] AgentDalePoopster@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh you mean that one weapons shipment that Biden very publicly refused to send, before he sent many more weapons?

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes. I do mean that one, and I agree that is was not enough. What additional stoppages do you think should occur?

[–] AgentDalePoopster@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

All of them, frankly. It's against US law to provide weapons to a nation that is using said weapons to commit human rights violations. My expectation is that the US follows its own laws.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Okay, I can work with that. Do you think ceasing all weapons shipments to Israel tomorrow would create a situation in which more or fewer people would die in the middle east in the next 10 years, and what is your reasoning behind that belief?

[–] AgentDalePoopster@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Obviously less, to the extent that anyone can predict geopolitical events that far in the future. I think the only counter-argument is the idea that an Israel that isn't receiving massive amounts of US aid will be invaded, but I don't find that argument convincing. It's an open secret that Israel has nuclear weapons, and even if the US stops arming Israel tomorrow I don't think Iran or their proxies are dumb enough to think that the US won't come rushing right back in if Israel is invaded.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not as certain that it would be obviously less, as there are surely myriad factors about which I have no information. But I respect and understand where you're coming from.

I'm not sure that the regimes propping up Iran wouldn't take the opportunity to capitalize on a serious draw-down of Israeli munitions, for various reasons, logistical (supply-chain) reasons among them.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Of course. But a mature adult likely wouldn't have injected the term "disarmed". Like we were enacting an arms embargo, which we do to dozens Of countries around the world.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay, so let's discuss the level of armament withdraw you think would be appropriate, and the affects varying levels might have.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, complete adherence to the Geneva conventions is a baseline requirement for any future military aid.

No aid that would affect the long-term health of human habitants such as mines or depleted uranium munitions.

Independent war crime investigations to be performed concurrently and concluded concurrently with internal investigations until some bar of accountability is established. With outstanding penalties to aid for proven falsification in these investigations.

If I had my druthers I would also like an end to mossad spying inside the US and AIPAC funding of our politics.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I pretty much agree with your positions 100%, in broad strokes, and will continue to send letters to that effect to elected officials.

I also believe that there are likely a slew of very complicated and interconnected factors within geopolitics that I'm unable to consider or include when formulating my opinion due to the classified nature of much of the world's foreign policy. For that reason I also try to rein in the part of my mind that tells me I know best what should be done.

The world is so intensely complicated and I struggle to not allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good, as I did in my 20s and 30s. It's very difficult to do when we're talking about death and destruction no matter what path is chosen.

The more I learn, the more I realize I don't know.