this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
-8 points (31.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7210 readers
333 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She even posted that selfown herself...

EDIT: I'm pretty baffled by the downvotes though. I though there aren't many republicans here?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Holy false equivalence, Batman.

Conceding to populism appointed Hitler. Pragmatism would have been to outlaw the NSDAP, and chuck Hitler in jail again.

[โ€“] basmati@lemmus.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Incorrect, that would have caused revolution and continued the violence. It also would have encouraged communists to more broadly recruit and educate people, and liberals really fucking hate the left wing.

Appointing Hitler was meant as the pragmatic choice, it was meant to bridge the gap between liberals who narrowly won the election and Nazis so that they could develop a bipartisan path forward without violence.

That is literally the reasoning given to appoint Hitler, and is why anyone with historical knowledge treats "pragmatic" liberals as being as dangerous as fascists.

Because you right wing people are as dangerous as fascists.