this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
-8 points (31.8% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7210 readers
338 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pragmatism appointed Hitler.
Holy false equivalence, Batman.
Conceding to populism appointed Hitler. Pragmatism would have been to outlaw the NSDAP, and chuck Hitler in jail again.
Incorrect, that would have caused revolution and continued the violence. It also would have encouraged communists to more broadly recruit and educate people, and liberals really fucking hate the left wing.
Appointing Hitler was meant as the pragmatic choice, it was meant to bridge the gap between liberals who narrowly won the election and Nazis so that they could develop a bipartisan path forward without violence.
That is literally the reasoning given to appoint Hitler, and is why anyone with historical knowledge treats "pragmatic" liberals as being as dangerous as fascists.
Because you right wing people are as dangerous as fascists.