this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
753 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58999 readers
4211 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

IIRC Norway has an actual Nat ID system, so assuming ðey develop a workable API for it ðis could actually be implemented quite easily.

Preventing kids stealing ðeir parents' IDs to open accounts anyway will be ð actual challenge.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

so assuming they develop

Psst… ðey

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee -1 points 3 days ago
[–] Anivia@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So then the kids will just use a VPN

Yup, ProtonVPN is free, and there are covert ways to purchase other VPNs (i.e. cash in an envelope).

All this would do is make it much harder for their parents to figure out what their kids are doing. If they can access it w/o a VPN, a regular internet logger can help inform parents of their traffic.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago

Kids often have no money, especially not money they can spend online, no?

[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No need of this. Make a mandatory physical check of the ID that can't be subcontracted. People want an account? They need to go to an office and open it there like it was the case in the past for a bank account.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev -1 points 6 days ago

could actually be implemented quite easily.

Without any risk for sure....

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 37 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Is there a reason that you use some character (I'm afraid I don't know the name of it) wherever you would otherwise use "th"? I can't guess if it's some kind of technical issue with federated text, something from a different language you're incorporating, or one of those "I think we should add x symbol to the language so I'll use it to draw attention to the effort" deals, like with the people that use the combined !? symbols whenever both are relevant at once.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

What ð heck are are you talking about, it looks normal. To me. Maybe ðeres someðing wrong wið your computer.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 61 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's a thorn, a letter making a th sound. Still in use in Icelandic, I think. In English, it's archaic at best.

Fun fact, when it fell out of use, the letter Y was used to replace it for a while. So when you see something saying "ye olde", verbally it's still "the old".

[–] kryptonite@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's eth, actually, not thorn.

I had thought that eth was used in Old English for the voiced "th" and thorn for the unvoiced "th", but Wikipedia says they were used interchangeably for both sounds.

You're right otherwise. Thorn was not available on printing presses because they were being made in countries that didn't use the letter, which is why the letter Y was used instead until "th" became more common.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorn_(letter)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eth

[–] pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

That's a shame, I would have loved to keep using those thorns and eths. Quite weird to think that they didn't even want to ask for a few customs pieces for those letters.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 week ago

I actually always wondered about the y in old texts. Thanks!

[–] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m probably doing exactly what they want here (e.g. having a conversation about it), but that letter is called “Eth” and was the Old English way of spelling the “th” sound: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eth

A number of linguistic buffs want to bring it back to the modern English alphabet.

[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

~~I don't think ð was pronounced exactly the same way as th~~Seems like I was thinking of other languages where they were/are pronounced differently.

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A møøse once bit my sister.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 days ago

This commenter has been sacked.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 0 points 1 week ago

Is there a reason that you use some character (I'm afraid I don't know the name of it) wherever you would otherwise use "th"?

Passive aggressive typing.

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whats that O with an aeroplane?

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It's the original English letter for th which was more or less deleted from the alphabet when imported printing press types lacked said letter.

Before it got universally replaced by th some printers used y like in "ye olde" which is really pronounced "the old"

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago