this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
753 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58999 readers
4253 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 103 points 6 days ago (9 children)

For all those that think this is the government overstepping with an unenforceable law, you are not grasping the intent correctly. Declaring that we have democratically decided to have an age limit for social media means that we have laid the groundwork for collective action. This means that suddenly schools, parents, teenagers themselves, etc. all have a reason and a mandate for keeping young people off platforms that we believe to be detrimental to their development and well-being. True democratic culture lies not in bourgeoisie domination (as many Americans like to believe), but rather in mutual trust and cooperation in order to solve common and big problems.

[–] erlend_sh@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Exactly!

It’s not about Totalizing Enforcement. What it changes is the cultural norm. Not right away but over time.

An age limit on alcohol never stopped anyone of any age to acquire alcohol, but it sets the societal bar for what’s acceptable. You don’t wanna be the parents that gave your kids alcoholic beverages at 13.

It’s always a little jarring how everyone very readily believes that the Scandinavian countries are the happiest in the world, but won’t believe that the incremental policy changes we implement here have any effect 🤷‍♂️

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 days ago

As a case study, we did this in 1988 with a smoking law that was incrementally improved with great success. It was controversial at the time, but is now generally regarded as such an obvious policy: no smoking in or around public transport, in bars and restaurants etc..

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 10 points 6 days ago

True democratic culture lies not in bourgeoisie domination (as many Americans like to believe), but rather in mutual trust and cooperation in order to solve common and big problems.

American here who has visited Scandinavia a couple times.

There are so many little differences, but they add up to a staggering divide in the amount of mutual trust and cooperation you see in little everyday interactions.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Enforcing it is virtually impossible.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago (3 children)

You are correct, but i'd like to expand a bit on how it could be solved.

It requires that all major social networks use BankID for all traffic from Norway.

Bypassing it would require a VPN, which is a simple hurdle.

But the major win here is that parents will enforce this. Parents can point to this law and say that they have to be old enough. As long as enough parents enforce this law and the VPN requirement is there, then it will probably be effective enough

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So you need a BankID to open an account on the covered platforms? That seems like a privacy nightmare.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (14 children)

Everyone in Norway has one, well like 99,99% or something. It is a requirement for banking.

It is used for all banking services in Norway. When you get your own bank account at 13 or something you also get BankID.

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago (11 children)

it's a privacy nightmare as it relies on google and apple servers to authenticate verification. neither of which are private. it also makes it impossible for european alternative operative systems to enter the market - giving a foreign state, the US, full control over what we can and can't do.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

We have SmartID and MobiilID in Estonia too, but you don't need it to log onto social media. You only need it

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

In Scandinavia every citizen has a registration number and the government has deployed state-enforced online digital identity system.

It’s not a privacy nightmare if you can trust the government. And in Scandinavia you generally can.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GenXLiberal@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

I’m not Norwegian or in Norway and I’m definitely doing this - my kids know of the problems of social networking (including the latest TikTok court docs and what the execs say.)

Some friends say that’s over the top; I just say it is responsible, involved parenting. I value their mental health.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago

And a 14 year old kid using a VPN is probably not the target audience for a lot of the worst abuse.

Not saying it won't happen, but a drastic reduction is better than none.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

+1, where I live they made phones during school hours illegal. Literally NOTHING changed it's just that if they want to they can get people in trouble.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Huh? So...only children get to use social media...?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago

Get off my Lemmy kids

[–] VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sad to see people here supporting the same kinds of policies that are diametrically opposed to privacy on the internet.

Parental control softwares are always parents failing to take the time to properly educate themselves and their children to the internet, as well as trust issue towards their children, which is bad parenting since it leads children into lying to them and finding alternatives as well as feeling seen "as a child", bad for teens...

Moreover those softwares are, as I said earlier nearly malwares

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Don't stop at social media. Put that same limit on religion, too.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›