Technology

60032 readers

2943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

708

Wikipedia is under assault: rogue users keep posting AI generated nonsense (www.techspot.com)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Wikipedia has a new initiative called WikiProject AI Cleanup. It is a task force of volunteers currently combing through Wikipedia articles, editing or removing false information that appears to have been posted by people using generative AI.

Ilyas Lebleu, a founding member of the cleanup crew, told 404 Media that the crisis began when Wikipedia editors and users began seeing passages that were unmistakably written by a chatbot of some kind.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Seems like that would be an easy problem to solve... require all edits to have a peer review by someone with a minimum credibility before they go live. I can understand when Wikipedia was new, allowing anyone to post edits or new content helped them get going. But now? Why do they still allow any random person to post edits without a minimal amount of verification? Sure it self-corrects given enough time, but meanwhile what happens to all the people looking for factual information and finding trash?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Or at least give it a certain amount of time before it goes live. So if nobody comes around to approve it in 24 hours, it goes live.

Usually bad edits are corrected within hours, if not minutes, so that should catch the lion's share w/o bogging down the approval queue too much.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Croudsourcing is the strenght that led to the vast resource and also the weakness as displayed here. So probably there will be a need for some form of barrier. Hence my suggestion.