Open Source

31685 readers

465 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Cloak@lemmy.ml

kevincox@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml

104

Are there any alternatives to the Internet Archive that are built around P2P, so that everyone can contribute to hosting/sharing web archives? Seems like having all these important archives hosted by (andrew.masto.host)

submitted 2 months ago by andrew@andrew.masto.host to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

@opensource

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sem@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like a potential application for a blockchain techs, that allows to do verifications, voting and consensus.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

Ive had similar ideas on verified unaltered media to combat fake news. Such an archive but for journalism would be a great start.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, quite possibly. Could still be very hard to get right. Region blocking might make consensus difficult.

Edit: just occurred to me, any method of consensus could be used to ddos sites as well. Might be best left for people smarter than me

[–] sem@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think that proof-of-work approach to blockchain can make ddos attacks much harder, but I'm not an expert too :)

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I figured that every node would need to scrap the site, in order to validate the content. If there are thousands of nodes, that would ddos the site.

I don't really understand how PoW would solve that, can you explain?

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I figured that every node would need to scrap the site, in order to validate the content. If there are thousands of nodes, that would ddos the site.

with cryptocurrencies the blockchain is distributed, its not stored centrally. your idea could work similarly

[–] sem@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it can be done like a NFTs on top of Bitcoin. In this case evey archived page is NFT and all the blockchain is available, so there is no centralized cite. If each action will require some computations (PoW) then ddos attack or spam attack will be very hard to implement.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Thats for proving its untampered with right? I'm more thinking of validating the archive copy is a "true" copy when adding it initially, which requires each node to check against the live site?

Its definitely an intriguing idea though, but I don't know enough to know how feasable it can be