ubergeek

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Trumpers blame Obama for things during, and after, the Trump administration... still.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 13 points 5 days ago

Lol, no shit?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They assumed all Black people know each other already, so no need to doorknock.

I wish I was fucking joking. They assumed it would be impossible for brown people to not hear all they needed to know via organic word of mouth.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago

Regardless of this action, Pelosi is bad.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's not true.

A perfect campaign would address the issuers voters have, and not insist everything is fine and voters facing homeless or food insecurity are just "leftists insisting on purity".

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Harris said she would let Israel keep doing it's thing, and just talk about it.

That's essentially "funding the genocide", no matter how you split it.

And yes, people decided to NOT choose between two pro-genocide candidates. You are, of course, free to ignore that, and act still confused about why she lost support in cities with large Arab populations.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Neither party is interested in brokering a y deal that doesn't include Israel genociding Palestinians.

Biden could have ended it by ceasing arms transfers, which he is legally required to do, since it was found the arms were to be used to aid a genocide. That's US law.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

And another good option!

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago

I mean, I read that as two class traitors, one of whom did the praxis to show which side he is on.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

All of those were on the chopping block. Remember we froze discretionary spending in year 2 of Biden. He called it a win for America.

Trump did tariffs in year 1, Biden left them, and added more.

So, yes, people voted to disrupt the status quo, in which they starve. Will they still starve? Probably, but the change was a chance for it to be different, rather than a 0 chance.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

People didn't want the order they are used to, aka the status quo...

People literally voted to wreck the "order they are used to"...

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

My gods... you're talking about a "soft landing" and "his accomplishments"...

You understand stonks going up doesn't matter if you are a week from being homeless, and an empty cupboard, right?

view more: ‹ prev next ›