toastmeister

joined 1 week ago
[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Its hard to compete with a party that offers programs using debt while also cutting taxes, because a high debt load can be kicked down the road and rolled over until it reaches a crisis.

A repeat of Trudeau Sr, which caused pain during Chretien who had to cut spending and raise taxes during a recession, which had his polls fall dramatically by the end.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Flat fees for breaking the law are only a tax on the poor. If money can buy you privilege then you live in an oligarchy.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In the most bureaucratic industry in Canada with the highest taxes?

If this is your idea of capitalism I'd say its a bit silly, people can't just build a 12 story apartment to service the demand, nimbys had it shut it down since the 1920s when they were redlining and not much has changed.

Its actually gotten far worse, there used to be loopholes like the Vancouver special, which were closed in the early 90s. Environmental and parking requirements were also much less.

Even provinces that did rezone very recently like BC are still littered with bureaucracy. This rezoning also should have been done a decade before we did 4% annual population growth, a logical order of operations that doesn't destroy the poor.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DX_-UcC14xw

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If you want systemic change to the economic system there's definitely an order of operations here to follow, wouldn't you agree?

If I want to redesign a roller coaster my first step shouldn't be to start removing the tracks while passengers are on it.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I agree. High demand from immigration; lack of supply due to greenbelt, slow permitting, property taxes being passed on as development taxes, and urban sprawl zoning.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why nationalize only oil, why not manufacturing, mining, lumber, hydro, etc..?

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I have a birth bath I don't ever replace the water in. Its like a shrub to me.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Alberta has no alternatives to export so loses a lot by shipping to the US. Alberta has a huge amount to gain by having alternative shipping routes. I think they'd be happy with things and the media would change their opinion pretty quickly.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Its concluding that if Alberta leaves Quebec will be screwed, so its in Quebecs interest to allow a pipeline to prevent secession. The tariffs on manufacturing emboldens this with an even larger crisis. The long term plan would be to end the reliance on Russian energy, assuming its true, but it seems to be unfolding as predicted so far which is neat.

Heres who was predicting it, starting about 28 minutes in:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enHNWDawcQo

view more: ‹ prev next ›