Exactly, we should assume that any international representation is not transparent
tiredturtle
joined 2 years ago
Blading. Trump could've easily razored his own ear open like wrestlers do.
Sad and yet not surprising as the external influence achieved the shift to the right
Lurking this thread and chiming in, but I don't know. Is it because of accelerationism? A faster collapse is quite harmful to many
I'm sorry this instance has problematic relationships with some capitalist overlords being favoured but you are correct.
I'll try to see if I catch examples happening
Sources like The Guardian, Reuters, Telegraph, CNN, BBC are sometimes allowed and sometimes removed on rule 1.
The latter case is usually evident while lurking and finding a deep long comment thread. Sometimes one user there has deleted messages and there's another's rule 3 content comments left. Apparently these cases seem to usually be mutual rule 3 but it looks like they're treated differently.
It is somewhat opaque how sometimes the rules apply and sometimes they don't, like news sources on rule 1, and iirc rule 3 in general. Deleting content should have the mod informing the user and the rest community what happened and have a way for the users to manage mistakes, be it either accidental rule breaks by the user or wrongful modding.
Maybe it's like a "takes one to know one" situation, as both the USA and China meddle in the Middle-East and Africa with an infantilizing attitude.
Good ideas. Blocking actually only hides content from the user, it doesn't lead to admin action.
It seems the libs were left out. Auth-conservative Macron chose to continue as is