theoretiker

joined 6 months ago
[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Except of you are doing research you'd need to write hundreds of emails asking for a paper, just to then find out that it doesn't contain the specific piece of information you are looking for.

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah that's really cool. So maybe similar to how turbulence can form at one point while the preceding flow remains laminar?

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

But you didn't choose to have the thought did you?

Quick think of a city and then explain to me why you didn't pick Cairo

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I want to rebuke you but you name is even more triggering. There is no linear chaos, you need non-linearities or discontinuities for chaos.

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Not executing it would also be predetermined. The only thing you can do is pretend to choose.

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Neurotypical exists. Neurodivergent is the more "leftist" or scientific term for what they mean.

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Where did that money go? Now it's just in the hands of some other rich dickheads.

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But then there are the dicks that we don't get to see because they would confuse and distract the audience (Willem Dafoe apparently)

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

But what's the normal amount? At what point does it become evidence of neurodiversity?

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Everytime I see these posts I experience this. Can somebody who definitely is not autistic please confirm that this doesn't occur in their life?

[–] theoretiker@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What a stupid piece. You don't need anything quantum to recognize optical illusions. An optical illusion as they talk about it means that an image could be recognized as two things. This can be done by just adding some noise to the image. Sometimes it gets recognized as one thing and sometimes like another, just like humans would.

view more: next ›