The condescension and patronisation is well deserved. Your question is answered in the fucking title of the paper.
The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking
If you’d ever engaged in critical thinking, then maybe we could have avoided this exercise.
It probably deserves its own post on techtakes, but let’s do a little here.
Diogenes’s corpse turns
Of course Saltman means “all of my buddies” as he doesn’t consider 99% of the human population as human.
Ugh. Amongst many things wrong here, people didn’t jerk each other off to scifi/spec fic fantasies about the other inventions.
AGI IS NOT EVEN FUCKING REAL YOU SHIT. YOU CAN’T CURE FUCK WITH DREAMS
I must be blind.
“Intelligence” in no way has been quantified here, so this is a meaningless observation. “Data” is finite, which negates the idea of “continuous” gains. “Predictable” is a meaningless qualifier. This makes no fucking sense!
“Moore’s law” didn’t change shit! It was a fucking observation! Anyone who misuses “moore’s laws” outta be mangione’d. Also, if this is true, just show a graph or something? Don’t just literally cherrypick one window?
“Linearly increasing intelligence” is meaningless as intelligence has not been… wait, I’m repeating myself. Also, “super-exponential” only to the “socio” that Ol’ Salty cares about, which I have mentioned earlier.
Oh hm but none of them are true. What now???
Stopping here for now, I can only take so much garbage in at once.