Joke’s getting a bit tired I think but RE: picture in article: I want to file a CoC(k) complaint
swlabr
joined 2 years ago
Oh cool what do you work on? I’d love to know the product.
Ah so you’re consistently choosing to make us horny!!!
It’s almost as if they have problematic conceptions (or lack thereof) of exploitation and power dynamics!
Hi hi please explain my boner
Hey, it costs a lot to coif up that hair.
>lightweight
>powered by large language models
lol
Unrelated to this: man, there should be a parody account called “based beff jeck” which is just a guy trying to promote beck’s vast catalogue as the future of music. Also minus any mention of johnny depp.
How did this thread blow up so much?
Sexy woman coded, perhaps, unless you’re saying that women who don’t have prominent breasts and what appears to be makeup aren’t real women
Why are you conflating “real”ness with sexiness?
But this is a drawing of a machine. Machines don’t have gender, biological or social or otherwise.
This is actually incorrect. Gender is a social construct. Anything can have gender if (a) society agrees upon it.
Whoever created this image thought, consciously or not, “I’m going to make a picture of a robot, and I’m gonna make it a sexy woman robot.” Not just a “woman-coded” humanoid robot […]
You have not proved this. Also, which is it? Machines don’t have gender, or this machine is a sexy woman robot? Your analysis and discourse are inconsistent and lacking.
because that can be done without playing heavy on the sexiness, right?
Again, the image is not particularly sexy. Just having large breast-analogs in the picture doesn’t make it sexy, unless you’re a stereotypical teenage boy.
So why? Why make a sexy woman robot? I ask again: Am I supposed to want to fuck it?
You have not earned the right to ask these questions.
Stupid sexy robots!
E: Oh also that’s just straight up rape culture.
Specifically about the pivot to AI art??? I gotta know…