stardustpathsofglory

joined 3 months ago

Or "Everybody knows that is fake!"

The result is still correct. There are multiple movies, therefore multiple actors which played the role of Duncan. If you are looking for an actor of a specific movie it usually helps to input also the year of the release.

[–] stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I guess it would have been faster if he just looked in the bears cave instead of a rabbit hole.

[–] stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Depends on what you call old and fitting for Halloween, but I can recommend Alice: Madness Returns .

Well at least in my circle of acquaintances are a lot who do not know it.

Yes this one is also great.

[–] stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

This is the way.

[–] stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Next: Carbon fiber filament for 3d printers

Happy Birthday 🎉

 

I am using a Samsung phone and even with all privileges deactivated it creates "stories". This seems illegal. What is your opinion?

I know I should use a different OS than stock or even another phone brand but this is what I currently have.

 

Me: mom can we have linux?

Mom: no, we have linux at home.

at home: Linex Forte

 

I hope questions are allowed here. I am curios if there is a different sort of scientific calendar which does not use the birth of Jesus as a reference like AD and BC. For example Kurzgesagt's calendars use the the current year plus 10000 as this represents the human better or something like that.

Would there be a way to do this more accurately? How could we, in a scientific correct way, define a reference from where we are counting years?

Also I have read about the idea of having 13 months instead of 12 would be "nice" because then we could have a even distributed amount of days per month.

Are there already ideas for this? What would you recommend to read?

 

Tes test

Posting something did not work before. So testing here again.

view more: next ›