A lot of people self host so they are in control. This is Plex taking away that control, plain and simple.
I don't know how many people host completely legitimately acquired content in their libraries, but your reasoning is such a cop out. Are you gonna defend them if they start scanning libraries for potentially illegally obtained content and blocking that because it could "put them in legal hot water?"
It bothers me that actually dirty and clean are right next to each other. I would swap 'only kinda dirty' with 'actually dirty' and reverse the order of all of them. Clean on the left and going progressively dirtier as we move to the right.
I've never heard it referred to as CSAP before. You may want to use the commonly used Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) acronym instead. The only remotely relevant reference I've found for CSAP is Committee on Sexual Assault Prevention which conflicts with the usage here. Also photos aren't the only format under that label.
Welcome to the new mod. I don't envy the position you all are in but have all the respect in the world for what you're trying to do ♥️
Yeah I use different VMs to separate out the different containers into arbitrary groups I decided on.
I run my docker containers inside different Debian VMs that are on a couple different Proxmox hosts.
I can't speak for everyone else, but I run about 6 different VMs solely to run different docker containers. They're split out by use case, so super critical stuff on one VM, *arr stuff on another, etc. I did this so my tinkering didn't take down Jellyfin and other services for my wife and kids.
Beyond that I also have two VMs for virtualized pihole running gravity sync on different hosts, and another I intend to use for virtualized opnsense.
Everything is managed via ansible with each docker project in its own forgejo repo.
All of the trackers are because of ads. If you upgrade the trackers go away. Doesn't address open source though.
I like where your head's at. I'm gonna go with the expecting more indictments angle paired with not being as rich/liquid as he'd like everyone to believe. What an unavoidable situation he's found himself in.
That's a valid point I hadn't considered. Based on a cursory look at how bail bond works, if you go with a bondsman you're out a certain amount regardless if you show up to court or not.
So if he paid the 200k he'd get almost all of it back after court, minus whatever processing fees the court has. If he goes with the bondsman he forks over 10% and the bondsman covers the other 90%, but he would get nothing back after court. The bondsman gets the full refund and keeps it all.
I can't imagine the return on that would move the needle much for someone as "rich" as he is. I don't know though, and I'll fully admit this is pure speculation.
I appreciate the absolute humility though
You lose comment history and all that jazz too but it's better than nothing. I'm not sure if devs plan to implement a way to do it but it's one of the reasons I decided to roll my own instance. Nothing more frustrating than using someone else's and losing access while they take days to get it back up.
Doesn't this make her point even more? Had to use a bondsman for 20k but he's super rich? Yiiikes
I'm taking a dump in my closet