pyrex

joined 8 months ago
[–] pyrex@awful.systems 3 points 2 months ago

HI I WANT TO READ THIS.

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago

NotebookLM was really useful to my friend who has a humiliation kink which he satisfies by erotically roleplaying on Discord: he simply copypasted the chatlogs into the AI input box and received a personalized podcast of two AI voices kinkshaming him.

His primary complaint was that it wasn't longer.

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I do not recommend using the word "AI" as if it refers to a single thing that encompasses all possible systems incorporating AI techniques. LLM guys don't distinguish between things that could actually be built and "throwing an LLM at the problem" -- you're treating their lack-of-differentiation as valid and feeding them hype.

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 7 points 4 months ago

I'll head in later and post badly!

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 8 points 5 months ago

I'M A BAT

I'M GAY

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 15 points 5 months ago

I mean, if no one's getting paid, then my preferred price is $0, to everyone in the world.

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're right! There's a disclosure on the page but it's fuckin tiny.

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 11 points 5 months ago
  • high willingness to accept painfully inexact responses
  • high tendency to side with authority when given no information
  • low ability to distinguish "how it is" from "how it seems like it should be"

Meta:

  • default expectation that others are the same way
  • indignant consent-ignoring gesture if they're not
 

The machines, now inaccessible, are arguably more secure than before.

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh, OK. I think all the VC-adjacent people still really believe in crypto, if it helps. They probably also don't believe in it, depending on the room. I think it will come back.

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Put me down for "doesn't think it will end." Did crypto end?

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's the technique of running a primary search against some other system, then feeding an LLM the top ~25 or so documents and asking it for the specific answer.

[–] pyrex@awful.systems 7 points 5 months ago

A friend who worked with her is sympathetic to her but does not endorse her: this is a tendency she has, she veers back and forth on it a lot, she has frequent moments of insight where she disavows her previous actions but then just kind of continues doing them. It's Kanye-type behavior.

1
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by pyrex@awful.systems to c/freeasm@awful.systems
 

NixOS is electing a committee that will elect the new governing body and design its systems.

One popular proposal is for this committee to consist of five people, of which two are intersectionally marginalized. (That is, marginalized in at least two ways) That is, of course, a quota.

Aaron Hall, who objects to all of this, has arrived.

I value fairness and treating everyone equally regardless of their class status. I would be wary of any statements that make some users feel they will be treated less preferentially to others due to their class status, sowing distrust and conflict.

...

It's a meta comment about distrust and conflict. There has been several comments made on this thread about privileging some people over others. We're on the internet. Nobody knows who is what class. I suggest we not make those kinds of comments because they are controversial and will lead to arguments and distrust in the broader community if users think they will be treated unfairly because their class is being unprivileged.

...

I know everyone looks at statements that privilege some over others and thinks they are sketchy. (In what way are they privileged? How does that work? Does that mean we get suboptimal decision making so that some class-privileged person can have a seat of responsibility and privilege?)

Nix is very cutting edge, and we'd like to see more diversity. Diversity will come with growth. Controversy will stifle growth. These kinds of statements are going to cause controversy and conflict, stifling the growth that will result in diversity. Instead you may be able to rope in tokens of diversity, but you won't actually achieve real organic diversity because the growth just isn't there.

...

Can you explain what did you put in place to obtain that diversity, can you qualify a bit that diversity? I'm looking at statements like "There was BIPOC", etc. Also, how did you measure that diversity?

We grew. We advertised on Meetup.com. We let companies know we existed so they could host us. We let colleges know we existed so students could find us. We were open to everyone. We made every effort to help everyone who was trying to help themselves.

One of the things we did that helped: We treated people fairly. We did not talk about elevating anyone with privilege over others because of their class.

Who? Black (native, island, African), White (European, Russian, native (all ethnicities)), Asian (Korean, Chinese), Islanders, Native American, Transgendered, very old, very young. etc.

I'm highlighting this because it's a reoccurrence of the discussion Jon Ringer kept having in apparent bad faith.

view more: next ›