puffy

joined 2 years ago
[–] puffy@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

It is hosted on Cloudflare, so that's an issue.

[–] puffy@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Not using degoogled phone

Internet access to non foss apps

NGMI

[–] puffy@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Why downvotes?

[–] puffy@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago

Read. Build. Repeat.

[–] puffy@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago

https://webbrowsertools.com/canvas-fingerprint/ has got everything you need to know about html5 canvas.

 

Since version 118+, Firefox introduced FPP (Finger Printing Protection) which is in short water downed version of RFP (Resist Finger Printing).

FPP is enabled by default from version 119 onwards if you enable ETP (Enhanced Tracking Protection).

FPP randomizes canvas data subtly than RFP, which is why RFP breaks some sites. So, my question is, if we allow canvas data extraction for a broken site will it fallback to FPP's subtle canvas randomization, or allowing it will expose canvas data completely if we have ETP enabled?

Relevant link: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-protection-against-fingerprinting

Edit: More info about HTML5 canvas fingerprinting https://webbrowsertools.com/canvas-fingerprint/