pajn

joined 1 year ago
[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago

It's very different doing those things willingly when all options are still there around you and a lot of other people are doing it anyway. And being in support of policies to reduce for example meat eating for everyone.

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 months ago

That's a lot of words to say nothing.It reads like it's written by big cement money since almost all arguments it brings up apply to concrete and steel as well, and that it comes to no conclusions just strengthen that feeling as it creates FUD without anything that could backfire. Of course it could also be based on actual research with real concerns about greenwashing that just communicates really poorly. But in any case there is nothing to be gained from this article.

I had hoped it would contain some data about origin, if local species are getting replaced, or anything else possibly interesting.

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 months ago

It never is, but it prevents them from continuing to build new planes were profit has priority over security and "accidentally" killing 100s of people

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Why? It's how patents always have worked. And even with a maximum of 20 years for patents they are more often used to stifle innovation rather than encourage it.

Copyright and patents should start at 5 years, and then be possible to extend 5 years at a time up to 20 years if the company owning the copyright or patent can prove it's still in active use and not only used to prevent others from moving forward.

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not though, like they say themselves it's only a reconsideration of the existing policies which is to maximize profit, morals be dammed. First they welcomed Nazis because Nazis gave them money and now they don't because Nazis cause other people to stop giving them money. If Nazis wasn't bad business nothing would have changed. This whole ordeal showed what kind of people they are.

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't standard USB C cables only 3A (60W)? And 5A (100W) only if they identify themselves with a built in chip?

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

TLS and SSH has quite different attack vectors so sure, basing SSH on TLS 1.3 would prevent the problems SSH has, but also bring in the problems TLS has. Thing is, I much prefer SSHs tradeof for things SSH is used for while TLS could be argued makes a lot more sense for the HTTPS use case. It just very different chains of trust with very different weak points, just pointing at TLS 1.3 as a solution when talking about SSH is quite ignorant.

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Use smarttube instead of the official YouTube app, the ads are gone and it's better in every other way as well. Faster, more features, quality settings stay where you left them, sponsorblock support and much more.

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It definitely was their gratest move ever. So many improvements was blocked by supporting the old extensions. Firefox would be completely useless and dead by now if they was still supporting them. Their loss in market share to chrome is largely due to not killing them 5 years earlier.

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If there's one service where you can check stolen CC info for $1 and another one for $5 you doesn't go with the $5 one for no reason. The $4 extra dollars doesn't matter in itself but that other places are several times cheaper does.

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

None of those work without both people having the app and so provide a much worse experience over SMS, just why?

[–] pajn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In Sweden I can't remember the last time I saw a plan that didn't include unlimited sms and calls. Only thing marketed is data. However if you really search for them I guess it's still possible to buy something else somewhere.

view more: next ›