Ah! But you can skip all that messy biology abd stuff i don't understand that's probably not important, abd just think of it as a classical computer running an x86 architecture, and checkmate, liberal my argument owns you now!
outhouseperilous
The most convincing arguments that llms are like humans aren't that llm's are good, but that humans are just unrefrigerated meat and personhood is a delusion.
Its not a fucking riddle, it's a koan/thought experiment.
It's questioning what 'communication' fundamentally is, and what knowledge fundamentally is.
It's not even the first thing to do this. Military theory was cracking away at the 'communication' thing a century before, and the nature of knowledge has discourse going back thousands of years.
Like literally all of them?
Maybe.
Hey, good news about the movie...
It doesn't know things.
It's a statistical model. It cannot synthesize information or problem solve, only show you a rough average of it's library of inputs graphed by proximity to your input.
You'd still be better off starting with a 50s language processor, then grafting on some API calls.
No, this isn't what 'agents' do, 'agents' just interact with other programs. So like move your mouse around to buy stuff, using the same methods as everything else.
Its like a fancy diversely useful diversely catastrophic hallucination prone API.
Yes but have you considered that it agreed with me so now i need to defend it to the death against you horrible apes, no matter the allegation or terrain?
I would say more "blackpilling", i genuinely don't believe most humans are people anymore after dealing with this.
So, what is 'understanding'?
If you need help, you can look at marx for an answer that still mostly holds up, if your server is an indication of your reading habbits.