nanook

joined 1 year ago
[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 4 points 4 days ago

@Quail4789 @mik Anything that you execute, yes.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 4 points 4 days ago

@Telorand I am not familiar with that distro, I am however familiar with how mount works. As far as what is immutable and what is not, you can set with chattr +i file/directory or chattr -i file/directory.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (11 children)

rm /home
mkdir /home
make /var/home a symlink to it.
Alternative, edit your /etc/fstab to mount on /var/home.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

@zwekihoyy If you look at any botnet on the net, it's going to be 99.999% windows machines, always. If you look at machines compromised by Ransomeware, that happens to Linux but rare, common on Windows. Windows is like a 20 year old asphalt road, patches upon patches.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 4 points 4 days ago

@naeap As long as it remains the easiest distro for me to get from initial setup to mangled the way I want it to work I'll stick with Ubuntu. It still tends to be more up to date than most other releases save Fedora but I do not care for the Redhat approach at all, they are rather like Windows in trying to force you to do it there way, "thou shall use LDAP and not NIS" for example. I don't like distros that think I should change my whole organization to suit their needs. Yea at some point I probably will switch to LDAP but will do it on my own terms in my own time not dictated by a distribution vendor. It is rather trivial for me to excise snap from Ubuntu, a lot more work to hack NIS into a system that doesn't natively support it.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com -1 points 4 days ago

Yea, I have a Manjaro box also, which is based up on Arch with some ugliness added to it, and yes, I have installed and run Arch before so I am familiar, only problem I've run into is every time I go to do an update one or more apps won't compile and I end up having to remove 35 programs and re-installing to fix. There are a lot of things to like about it though, particularly having packages that are just tar files makes them very easy to extract / modify / create. But not a great system if you just need to get things done.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 9 points 4 days ago

@0x0 No, Mozilla maintains their own repository. You can delete snap firefox and snap everything else, add the mozilla repository, and install firefox from there. You'll get a more current version as a side benefit. Instructions found here: askubuntu.com/questions/150203…

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 19 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Snap turns your system into a slug at boot time, makes it take forever to shut down as it unmounts fifty memory file systems, scatters files all over the place turning a neat organized system into a pile of shit. I primary run Ubuntu, but I excise snap from it as one of the first orders of business.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 4 days ago

@LeFantome Even running a MIPS emulator in a 12-bit (4k) address space is a real good trick.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 1 points 5 days ago

@rotopenguin @IceFoxX SELinux comes pre-installed on all Redhat derived systems and is an option in all Debian based systems, though I prefer AppArmor, it is just easier to configure and breaks fewer things.

[–] nanook@friendica.eskimo.com 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

@thevoidzero @gencha What I like about GNU/Linux is precisely it's configurability, I can use whatever desktop I want, whatever greeter I want, whatever kernel I want, whatever applications I want for a given purpose, on damned near whatever hardware I want, I mean someone recently even got Linux to boot on a 4004, it took three days but it booted. I am curious how they pulled that off without an MMU and I can only imagine the amount of paging involved with it's 12 bit address space, but point is what you can do is almost infinitely variable. Some may use a distro because it makes software work together well, but I use it as a starting point and modify it to my needs and wants. With Windows or MacOS, I got one Desktop, one provided kernel, a more limited range of supported hardware, and close to zero customization options aside from very basic things like desktop background and color schemes.

view more: ‹ prev next ›