murbul

joined 1 year ago
[–] murbul@aussie.zone 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's better parked than most cars I've seen along there, with room to get past without any fear of being doored. It's not ideal but I give it a pass.

It's not legally a bike lane either because it isn't marked correctly (a painted white bike symbol isn't enough), but regardless, any bike lane that allows parking is a bike lane in name only.

[–] murbul@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

All of the LNP minions are saying it now

[–] murbul@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

I’m so screwed. 6 times in the last 5 minutes.

[–] murbul@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

cOaLiTiOn Of ChAoS

Ugh. Might need to turn this into a drinking game to make it through this meeting.

[–] murbul@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow that sign is extra ridiculous. I think most people would struggle to read it standing right in front of it let alone driving past.

s316 does give a lot of leeway e.g.

(b) the sign has additional information on or with it; or

(e) the sign is combined on a single panel with 1 or more other traffic signs; or

The point where it becomes substantially different is pretty subjective, which IMO shouldn't be a thing when you're talking about road rules, but it's sadly not the only example.

[–] murbul@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Signs that have a "reasonable likeness" to standard signs are covered under s316: https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/sl-2009-0194#sec.316

Number in a red circle is likely enough for it to be considered official, but yeah I would like to see it challenged.

[–] murbul@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

He's also blocked on MB's Facebook where he uses his real name. And TBF he is a bit of a troll. Although the bar for being banned by the minister is fairly low. Any kind of negative sentiment on his posts is usually hidden or outright blocked pretty quickly.

[–] murbul@aussie.zone 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'd really like to see the speeding fines formally challenged in some way. You hear stories from cyclists that they or their mates have had them overturned, but I haven't seen any actual evidence of this. Maybe it's the case that police just choose not to proceed when the fines are challenged, and avoid setting a formal precedent in the courts.

It would also be interesting if this specific case was challenged. Like you say, it sounds like the 10km/h is supposed to be advisory, but the sign they have used is a regulatory sign which can be enforced by a literal reading of the rules. Not sure if it would hold up in court, and might come down to the judge's attitude towards cyclists.

 

Bob* was riding across the Kurilpa Bridge into the city on a quiet school holiday Friday morning, also coincidentally World Car-Free Day, when ... BAM, he was $464 poorer.

[–] murbul@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fox got blocked after that :)

I've ridden with Mark Bailey before and he rides FAST. His PR for the Goodwill Bridge is 44km/h with 33 km/h average, and consistently well above 20km/h average for most of his rides. I don't think you can wave all that away as a GPS glitch.

[–] murbul@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cr Massey:

It's clear the St Lucia to West End bridge is going to disappear

Council says 'Yeah we want to do it, but now we need the other levels'

Please don't listen when they say our promise was only $550 million. They talked about five bridges, the delivery should be five bridges.

view more: next ›