libre_warrior

joined 4 years ago
[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

Cryptocurrencies are a waste of resources and gives might to those with computing force, that is the mighty.

There is no reason to inbosom it.

Let's rather effort towards moneyless societies.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

All Cryptocurrencies Are Bad

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

Yes, that's a trap. When you make the thing you love into a job. You blur the lines of whether it still is meaningful or something you do because you love it. You are no longer guided the meaningful, but whether your bloodgivers finds it valuable. In smaller and larger ways your path is steered away from the meaningful.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Superiority complex in the comments.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Tech is made to make us feel stupid, so you are not alone in feeling that.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

If the symbolism doesnt matter that much to you, you could use the letter "v" as the icon.

Here I found a black on white drawing of a handsign for the letter v under Creative Commons by Erik Bolstad, Store Norske Leksikon.

handsign for the letter v

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Imperialist outlet Independent privacy washing surveillance messager Meta Whatsapp. They are platforming might - that is Meta Whatsapp spokesperson - instead of privacy focused organizations such as Electronic Frontier Foundation. Painting Iran as paranoid after litterally being attacked by zioni supremacist ruledom.

Now let's be clear. Morality police is bad. Women Life Freedom. They are suppressing humanity. But this work is made to embolden Israel and western might.

Side with folks instead. We need to enblossom the folks at ground so that they can become independent of might.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

Why are we promoting trash?

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Dismantle all walldoms!

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I'll say that I do believe in what you point to as [linguist purity], BUT I also think that this framing is a misnomer that ought to be relighted. Towards weightening how we are better able to think around images and craft our own words. Towards speaking from our soul, towards seeing the souls of others. I'll instead relight to the term blossomframe to weighten this birth.

It's like how poets are cooking forth delightful images that we thouroghly understands through meltable words. Its not that poets use less latin because they feel like english is above, but rather because english speakers are better able to fully melt english than latin.

Or how using less loanwords when talking with children makes them more easily understand. Why would we not want our words to be this meltful in all manners of speech? Why cant we make the wholeness of the english tongue become plain english?

When english is a blend of many different tongues, we have to fathom the rules of each of them in order to understand and craft words. Latin, french, greek and english. This in turn also makes us spend a lot more time when trying to understand a word or crafting a word.

By using the blossomframe, it would turn anarchist writings much more fathomful. It would make it easier to question framings. Our learning would shift our awareness away from the wordbook and academia towards crafting framings that resonates with our soul. It would shift forces of tongue away from academia, capitalists and might towards the folk. Making the words of the commoners have more weight than that of might.

To inbosom the blossomframe is to enblossom all folks with these forces of change?

The blossomframe is the grounds for unweightening might. It is the grounds for the blossoming of mankind.

Wordbook

  • relight :: To use another word or another framing.
  • tongue :: The forthgang we use to speak with one another.
  • leeth :: Written words that speaks to our feelings.
  • leether :: One who makes leeths.
  • birth :: Traits that comes just because of what it is.
[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Since NewPipe doesnt use all the features of peertube. For deem, it doesnt let you comment on videos nor upload videos.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The post is about anarchism, so I dont see why it doesnt fit under this community.

 

We misunderstand the strengths of the commons of tools and not knowing how we play to our strengths.

Free software today is usually promoted through big brands like libreoffice, gimp or firefox. These are successful in terms of branding, but is not playing to the strengths of the commons. In the commons, we move away from the walled and towards the interconnected.

The strenghts doesn't lie in bloated and branded tools, but rather in the small tools that anyone can make if they have some spare time. We need to reframe away from the bloatedness to the caresome. Where the tools are easily made, available by birth and easily tinkerable.

And we need towards the descriptive instead of the branded. Towards letting words dictate tools instead of tools dictating words.

Today operating systems revolves around the branded, bloated and wasteful. The lokening is to move towards operating systems that inbosoms the caresome and descriptive.

 

Freedom is such a vague word, we shouldn’t use this word if we want to be precise about what we mean by it.

When we talk about free software, we point to transparency, studyability, tinkerability and sharability. The openness to allow ourselves to use our tools with freedom.

However, I do not think we should use the term open source. The reason for my distancing of the word source is because the word makes us think about development instead of the end user. Because if we want these kinds of software to appeal to the masses, we the word to emphasize that it is meant for them. Instead, I would use the term open software, open tool or open machine.

1
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by libre_warrior@lemmy.ml to c/fediversefutures@lemmy.ml
 

EDIT: More precise titles.

The way we sort comments on lemmy today is through giving everyone the ability to up and downvote any comment. You upvote comments you want to be more visible and downvote comments you want to have less visibility.

I think ranking comments are great if some opinions contribute more.

Imagine the value of a comment can be determined before voting. Perhaps with a panel of judges. With rankings -10 to 10 where -10 is dangerous misinformation, 0 has no meaningful contribution and 10 is perhaps mindblowingly enlightening or empowering.

Example of lemmy style sorting

Lets say a post is submitted. On the first day, it received the comments with a judges score (user, score):

(monkey, 8), (zebra, -2), (horse, 5), (panda, 3), (rhino, 3).

A post get the most visibility the first day. Therefore, those who post early can get a lot of votes.

However on the second day, one user submitted the comment:

(Flower, 9)

A this point in time the post doesnt have that many voters. And the top comments has increased visibility, so for every vote flower gains, the top comment might have received another. So we end up with the final ranking:

Monkey, horse, panda, flower, rhino, zebra.

So it ends up only ranking similar to panda and rhino even though the score was much higher. There was a mismatch between votes and score.

Solution, the topoligical sort

We should concider moving away from voting on comments individually to voting comparatively. Where you perhaps determine the most valuable comment out of a selection. Then a topological sort can put the best comment on top.

So even if flower is late to the party, their insight is still spread.

 

English is burdened with a culture that emphasize empirialism, capitalism, individualism and so on. A culture that ignores climate catostraphy, global inequality and brings disproportionate attention to countries with english as national language. Additionally english is the language of Trump, Boris Johnson, Margareth Thatcher and George Bush jr.. Protest the english language by embracing esperanto.

Break language segregation! Today, the world is segregated by language. It is very resource heavy to learn a new ethnic language.

Esperanto is like other constructed languages made to be easy to learn through consistent grammer, phonetics and morphemes. You know how to pronounce a sentence. You can determine the type of word by looking at the last letter. Even if you havent seen a particular word before, the chances are that you can predict its meaning if you know the morphemes. It is estimated that it requires a tenth in time investment to learn esperanto compares to ethnic languages.

The world language is political and it enables english imperialism.

Look up your local esperanto group. Learn it. Talk about it. With collegues, friends, acquantances and family. Engage your local community. Influence!

Some useful resources: Dictionary https://lernu.net/vortaro ActivityPub https://esperanto.masto.host Nice esperanto course: Kurso de Esperanto

 

I experience that my memory is used up on my android phone, but I dont understand what drains the memory.

I only found AnotherMonitor on fdroid, but it doesnt appear to show which app is consuming memory. Only total consumption.

Are there any good apps or solutions for this? Or at least as autonomous slash private as possible.

 

I'm interested in a complimentary federated service for peertube and similar services. One can subscribe to creators and instances. You can't create independent posts, because it is solely made as a subscription service. However you can comment on creations.

It is intended as a tool to keep track of creators you are interested in, and have a seamless experience with going from one video to the next and be able to post quick comments.

I'm envisioning that this service could be distributed and serverless like Scuttlebutt. That way, there would be no signup process involved. One could then download software/ app for your phone and start adding instances and creators.

To comment, one would perhaps need some verification system, like connecting your app to a user to avoid misuse.

A service like this would act similar to an federated RSS, but with more flexibility.

I believe a service like this would be superior to any subscription solution we have today, that be through RSS, peertube,

I believe this would bring a lot of utility to the fediverse. It would make it far easier to develop new federated projects. And it would be a great gateway into the fediverse. It would make it far easier to interact with content which would make the fediverse look more populated and more exciting.

If you think this is a good idea, say aye in the comments.

1
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by libre_warrior@lemmy.ml to c/linguistics@lemmy.ml
 

Stop it. Just stop.

Why you call it RSS when you could simply have called it syndication? Why call it CEO when you could have called it top chief. You are making your language harder to understand for no good reason. Why call it TLDR when you can call it summary. Like what the fuck...

 

I have a subscription of Family and Friends on the site tab.digital. This would allow me to add apps to my nextcloud. One of the apps I have been most excited about has been the News app, which can administrate open subscription feeds like RSS. However, I have a couple issues.

First of all, I've been notified that the app is unstable on my Family and Friends subscription from a dialogue box. I don't know if that is due to me having the wrong subscription or whether it has to do with the app itself being unstable.

So far I've ignored that warning, because I can risk the service failing. I'll just have to contact the provider to reset in that case.

I have sent an email to the provider, but I expect an response on monday so It's kind of long to wait.

Does anybody have any experience with News app on Nextcloud or with tab.digital?

 

No corporations, no profit based businesses, no state. Only non-profit organizations. Would this be communism?

If so, could this possibly be self-sustainable? How can such decentralized society structure possibly self sustain without the threat of centralization?

 

I'm thinking about anti capitalist investments.

Traditionally, it has been common to talk about investment in the sense of "generating" wealth. The economy is going to grow, therefore it is good to invest your money in mutual funds or diverse portfolios.

Traditional investment is orwellian for buying the rights to workers labor. Therefore, by principle I shouldn't invest in the traditional sense.

But just having money just laying around in the bank isn't very clever either as inflation will devalue it. So I'm thinking about anti capitalist investments.

Investments in non-profits

My idea of investment doesn't just encompass how to increase my personal wealth, but also the wealth of the planet, wealth of human beings and wealth of animals. This means that I consider a donation an investment. I could view such investments as giving much higher return than even the most ethical company.

By donating, I'm also incentivizing myself to pay more attention to these organizations.

Investment in personal property

I could invest in possessions that I predict is going to be very useful to fight capitalism. I could buy tools to create independence from big tech. Or items that improve my mental health or helps to connect with other people.

Investment in personal sector

I could work less in order to invest in my personal wealth and working for non-profit sector.

Investment in independence from work

Another investment type is one to reduce loans and expenditure to as close as zero. This would reduce the corporate and state workforce. It would also free up your time to do what you want to do. Perhaps start a non-profit or spend your time helping out established ones.

What are your thoughts on this?

view more: next ›