lancalot

joined 1 week ago
[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Quite the contrary, the commit log on Github looks pretty healthy.

On what did you base the following:

it has not been updated since a while.

[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 4 points 2 days ago

You can still edit it. Please consider doing so ๐Ÿ˜….

[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

should I be looking at any other distros?

From what I can tell,

  • containerization is appealing to you; almost all of them employ this to some degree, but some more than others. More on that later.
  • your preference goes out to (closer to) stock experiences rather than opinionated ones

I take it that you'd rather stick to the (relatively-speaking) more popular options. Not that popularity is necessarily good, rather not used by anyone else is bad.

Then, the following are worth looking at as well:

  • NixOS; it's quite different to all the others, perhaps we may call it obtuse by comparison. But, it has been going at it for the longest; heck, it's older than Ubuntu. And, in my humble opinion, is one of the main inspirations for the others. But, contrary to the likes of Fedora Atomic or Vanilla OS, it doesn't go all-in on OCI. Therefore, it might not be as smooth of a transition.
  • Guix System; the answer to "What if we had FSF-compliant NixOS, but with actually good documentation?" Jokes aside, this is a cool and underrated distro.
  • openSUSE Aeon; relatively new still, but perhaps already offers the most secure OOTB experience. However, from what I can tell, in terms of transition to OCI, it doesn't strive to be very revolutionary (as of yet). Fedora Atomic seems to be a relatively significant (and IMO exciting) departure from traditional Fedora. By contrast, openSUSE Aeon seems more like a ~r~evolution with a (very) small r. Though, one may argue this is mostly due to maturity. Consider openSUSE Kalpa if you're feeling particularly adventurous.
  • uBlue's base images; Aurora, Bazzite and Bluefin are built from these. These are vanilla images with only hardware enablement, codecs, other RPM Fusion goodies and more that anyone installing Fedora Atomic would want on their systems anyways.
  • Create your own; See this link if you know how to write containerfiles. See this link if you prefer yaml (.yml to be more precise) instead. The previous links were more focused on Fedora Atomic, this link offers Vanilla OS' answer.

Other distros found on lists like this one didn't make the cut for various reasons; sometimes it's just because I haven't heard enough of it.

Do I need to shift my expectations of an immutable distro even more?

Uhmm..., I don't know exactly what your expectations are ๐Ÿ˜œ.

FWIW, from what I gather, either (something based on) Fedora Atomic or Vanilla OS should be right up your alley.

[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Important elaboration. Much appreciated.

I'm mostly oblivious of what's required to run an ISP. But you mentioned servers yourself. Do you install Linux Mint on your servers?

[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Fair. Even if some may dismiss it as anecdotal (N=1), I do think it's valuable. Thank you.

[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 1 points 3 days ago (6 children)

with Mint when the next release you are more likely than not going to have to re-install

First time hearing this. Got anything to back that up?

[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Still getting the hang of Ubuntu, but I see a lot of comments on different posts in which a majority of them point to using Mint instead.

Ubuntu should be okay; it's not necessarily a bad pick. However, the community has been upset with some of its past decisions and (more recently) the implementation of its vision, i.e. their enforcement of Snaps. This has eventually led to our current situation in which it has become popular to hate on Ubuntu.

Would the best recommendation, be to switch to Mint from Ubuntu?

Personally, I've stopped recommending beginners to Ubuntu. This is primarily for how the above mentioned enforcement has lead to ~~broken~~ unintuitive interactions. However, if you've already started using it and are content with what you have, then the negative sentiment by itself shouldn't warrant a switch.

Though, granted, (I think) most Linux users have indulged in distro hopping; some have even made it their hobbies. So you shouldn't feel bad about switching either. Though I implore you to practice best practices while at it:

  • Keep using your home base until you're certain of the switch.
  • Don't nuke your home base to experience another distro. Make ample use of live USBs, VMs and dual booting instead.
  • Try to understand the difference between the fundaments and the auxiliary when experiencing new distros; i.e., what is and isn't possible for you to import to your home base without outright switching.
[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i found it difficult to get a working guide for nvidia drivers

I am saddened to hear that. Did you try the guide found on RPM Fusion?

As another user said, opting for a derivative with built-in Nvidia drivers might be another option worth considering.

[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 22 points 4 days ago (5 children)

GrapheneOS FTW!

[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 3 points 4 days ago

Thanks OP; now I need this ๐Ÿ˜œ.

For the last year or so, I've been using Vimium and mouseless. For the latter, I'd probably use warpd or wl-kbptr instead if I could get them to work on Fedora Silverblue.

[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 7 points 4 days ago

Best Distro

Needs dictate preferences. An objective assessment isn't possible even on an individual level, as circumstances change over time. Linux Mint serves as a common starting point, with many users eventually 'graduating' to other distributions. The opposite is also true; many eventually return to low-maintenance distros like Linux Mint, preferring something that 'just works'.

Iโ€™m very curious of which distro users loves the most that they have it on their daily hardware?

I daily drive secureblue.

[โ€“] lancalot@discuss.online 1 points 4 days ago

Is there a specific android app you need?

Currently, there are already a couple I need beyond future-proofing.

https://gitlab.com/android_translation_layer/android_translation_layer/

Thanks for mentioning this! While I've had some experience with Waydroid in the past, this is completely new to me. Looking at it briefly, it seems to operate differently than Waydroid's full Android emulation approach. Instead, it works as a translation layer (like Wine), making it both more efficient and potentially better integrated with Linux. Is this a correct assessment?

Despite having researched Android on Linux solutions before, I hadn't come across this one. Typically, these discussions only mention Anbox or Waydroid.

 

Greetings fellow privacy enthusiasts!

I'm searching for a privacy-respecting media box that can run Android apps. The streaming device market features options like Shield TV, Chromecast and various Amlogic boxes. However, finding one that truly embraces FOSS principles while meeting essential needs has proven challenging.

Essential requirements:

  • Android app compatibility - specifically need to run certain apps
  • Strong privacy and security features
  • Reliable, long-term software support (I've grown weary of devices becoming obsolete within 2-3 years)
  • Budget-conscious: Aiming for under 150โ‚ฌ, though I'm willing to invest appropriately for the right solution
  • Willing to invest significant time in initial setup, but afterwards it should "just work" with minimal maintenance
  • Timely and automatic security updates (ideally close to upstream releases)

My initial research suggests two potential approaches, though I'm not entirely certain about all implications:

  1. Mainstream devices (like Nvidia Shield) that can be degoogled through ADB commands
  2. Devices that are officially supported by LineageOS

While both paths seem promising, each raises certain concerns. For instance, degoogling might require ongoing maintenance, and running LineageOS could mean losing some device-specific functionality (as is the case with Shield).

The Raspberry Pi, with its open-source foundation and community-driven LineageOS development, seems interesting, though the lack of institutional backing raises some concerns about long-term reliability.

I'm still learning about the security implications of these choices. While I understand that phones running LineageOS don't match GrapheneOS's security standards, I'm uncertain how these considerations translate to a media box environment.

I'm open to exploring:

  • Custom firmware solutions
  • Alternative hardware platforms
  • Creative, FOSS-friendly approaches that preserve privacy while maintaining Android compatibility

Has anyone in the community successfully navigated these choices? Your experiences and insights would be invaluable, particularly regarding long-term viability and security considerations.

view more: next โ€บ