hitmyspot

joined 2 years ago
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

Gig economy is better distribution of asset use, as I said. The problem to correct is distribution of ownership, again as I already said. Stop drinking the socialism kool aid. Nobody owning cars is more likely than community ownership.

Car ownership may not go away but it's likely to decrease. It's rare in America to not own a car. It's less rare in cities with good public transport, eg New York, Europe. Self driving, on demand taxis may mean the same effect is carried over to places that currently don't have great public transport.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The alternative, where a government can restrict the actions of companies in other jurisdictions is more scary.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

While I agree with you, in principle, I much prefer my toilet than a public toilet with partial privacy and partial cleanliness.

I think it's going to be interesting when we move from private ownership of cars to self driving, shared, how there may be different classes again, like trains of old. It's inevitable we transition. The gig economy is effectively a more even distribution of resource usage with benefits environmentally. However, we need to ensure it's more even ownership too, which is looking unlikely at this point.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lol, too weak Trump has a ring to it. Very clever.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

What I mean is that they should be made to care. The airlines with fines. The government with lost votes.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Isn't this full itineraries and other information beyond that? It's an invasion of privacy and the airlines should be liable and the government should be stopped from doing it.

The only way to fix these kids of breaches is to hold the people who do it as responsible as the company.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

As intended, I assume.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago

How can they prosecute someone who fights back when the person they fought was wearing a mask? It would be self defence.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago

Well, he is a convict.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, that’s Sookie. You’re thinking of Katie Holmes daughter.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Now log in with your Microsoft account. No, the link was to your work email, you can’t log in with your personal email. Now you’ve logged in with your personal account, you’ll need to change to teams for workplaces. No, the new one. I’m sorry, that link was for a different version of teams, your account is showing unusual activity. We’re going to send a link to start the process of resetting your password.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago

It’s all a house of cards, so it may all come crashing down. A few have tried and failed to harness MAGA support. Ron DeSantis being the biggest crash and burn.

view more: ‹ prev next ›