half

joined 1 year ago
[–] half@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Catzilla. Truly a loaf incarnate.

[–] half@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

A mild cigar.

[–] half@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

With due respect, it is time to go outside.

[–] half@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

When I fall off my routine I lose a ton of progress. That first hundred K after a long rest absolutely sucks for me. I won't run on an injury, but I understand the fear of the pit.

[–] half@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

All hail. I was very, very young to this.

[–] half@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Relatable. You know how it is when your sleeves get wet and they kinda stick to your wrists or flop around getting other stuff stuck to them... ugh.

[–] half@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

My first night in my freshman dorm, I played this on the upright piano. Excellent decision. Pro tip to the young geeks: nothing waters the flowers like suicidal ideation wrapped in a veneer of artistic integrity. I can't even sing for shit, that's how well it works.

[–] half@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You're right. I'm sorry for taking my frustration with the forum out on you.

[–] half@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Yes, if you throw democracy in the trash, ignore the rights of the unpopular, and pass any law that appeals to today's public morality, then you'll have lots of options. I just don't want to hear you guys complain after this idealism gets spun to fuck you over by corporate lawyers more skillful than your populist politicians. But fuck me for pointing out the logical inconsistencies in the useless seething groupthink machine, I guess. Apparently I only have rights if the public likes me.

[–] half@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

We're talking about criminal law. Can you clearly, objectively, without arbitrary valuation of goods or services, define a legal principle which identifies the point at which a health plan cut becomes a crime?

 

For my money, the worst thing about Blade Runner is how it created a franchise based on its own adaptation. The net negative outcome is we're now categorically unlikely to ever see a cinematic portrayal of Rachael Rosen throwing a goat off a roof.

The best stuff in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? is not in Blade Runner. The animal worship is tricky. It's a source of dark humor that takes time to blend in with the rest of the world; while it lampoons the insanity of industrialized passions, it runs the risk of making the world goofy, and thus also the characters. I understand why Scott and company evaded it. It's the chess that I love and miss.

There are multiple scenes in which opposing characters attempt to outmaneuver each other so subtly that the reader isn't immediately aware it's happening. The experience I loved so much was going back to reread the last few pages armed with the knowledge that these characters are actively trying to kill each other without letting on. I can't think of anything else that gives me those particular tingles, and it's a shame that the theme was unintentionally scraped out of the visual media franchise. I would love to see a different take on the source, but I also love the secret knowledge of this ultimate game of cat and mouse. Regardless, Electric Sheep remains an excellent example of a book with so much going on that thirty million dollars couldn't capture it all.

On a barely related note, I'd love to see a feature film adaptation of Eye in the Sky.

view more: next ›