dwazou

The Good Law Project has been working to help a young man who has been denied justice after he was sexually assaulted by a star journalist at the Daily Mail.

The young man, who we shall call X, was groped by the journalist, whom we are naming only as J. The Daily Mail has previously received a complaint of sexual assault by J from another man. These are not the only victims of J to whom Good Law Project has spoken.

Homeowners in the Rosemont neighborhood of Montreal successfully killed an affordable housing project that was supposed to add 50 condos on an empty lot. This is happening despite the housing crisis that the city is facing.

The proposal looked like this.

But the local homeowners opposed it.

They feared losing a sunny view and precious parking spots for their cars.

"Our entire neighborhood is only 3-storey buildings or smaller" says Hugo Didier, the leader of the local anti-housing movement. "We do not want tall buildings here. It is just too inconvenient" he said.

Local city council members in Rosemont-La-Petite-Patrie initially supported the project. « We are facing a major housing crisis, we need to do more » said mayor Francois Limoges. What they didn't expect was the opposition.

158 individuals signed a petition against the new project, demanding a neighborhood referendum. At least 200 people showed up at a public hearing. Under pressure, the council shut down the entire project.

Real estate developer Félix Péladeau-Langevin was behind the proposal. He planned to build 50 new condos. « The location is good. It's close to public transit and to a bike lane. I didn't plan to add any parking spot » he told us.

Péladeau said he was disappointed by the opposition from local homeowners. "They went door to door. They convinced everyone to put their name and signature against the proposal, demanding a referendum"

Protest leader Hugo Didier says he reached out to the developer and offered a compromise. Just build a small building.

« I look at the cost of the land and the cost of construction. If they don't want a multi-storey building, it's just not worth it » Péladeau said.

https://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/grand-montreal/2025-04-10/rosemont/50-logements-bloques-malgre-les-nouveaux-pouvoirs.php

The Social Security Administration is cutting staff from its communications office, and will rely on social media posts instead of press releases to update the media and the public.

Social Security Regional Commissioner Linda Kerr-Davis told employees in a call Thursday that regional offices will no longer issue press releases or letters. Instead, the agency will be using X to communicate.

The Social Security Administration is cutting staff from its communications office, and will rely on social media posts instead of press releases to update the media and the public.

Social Security Commissioner Linda Kerr-Davis told employees in a call Thursday that regional offices will no longer issue press releases or letters. Instead, the agency will be using X to communicate to the press and the public.

Peers working for big City firms including Santander, Secure Trust Bank and the London Stock Exchange are currently sitting on a new House of Lords panel scrutinizing regulation of the financial services industry, the Guardian has found.

Th House of Lords committee has been highly critical of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), despite a number of the committee members being paid by companies that are overseen by the FCA.

The chair of the committee, Michael Forsyth, was until May last year chair of the UK retail bank Secure Trust Bank, which is regulated by the FCA. He is still a shareholder, according to his register of interests.

Lord Forsyth wrote to the FCA saying the committee didn't agree with the regulator’s plans to name companies under investigation in cases where it was in the public interest.

Currently, 9 other members of the 13-person committee have interests in financial services companies.

The Liberal Democrat peer Sharon Bowles is paid by the London Stock Exchange plc.

Labour peer Clive Hollick is an adviser to the fund Hambro Perks.

John Eatwell is an adviser to Palamon Capital Partners and a non-executive director of Unity Trust Bank. Another Labour peer, Jonathan Kestenbaum, is a director of Windmill Asset Management, and is also a director of the JP Morgan Japanese Investment Trust.

Peter Lilley, a former Tory cabinet minister, is an adviser to a Shanghai investment fund, YiMei Capital. Jonathan Hill, another former Tory minister, is an adviser to the Spanish bank Santander and the payment company Visa Europe.

Anthony Grabiner declared that he sat on the board of Goldman Sachs from 2014 to 2022, and has shareholdings that include Citigroup, HSBC and UBS

A spokesperson for the Lords committee said its members came from “different walks of life, from across the UK, and represent a wide range of professions and backgrounds”

Tom Brake, the director of the campaign group Unlock Democracy, said it would have been “safer” had members with financial interests in the sector recused themselves

Brake questioned whether putting pressure on the Financial Conduct Authority not to name financial service companies under investigation was really in the interests of consumers.

Former Conservative Minister Michael Gove was handed a peerage in former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s resignation honors Friday, allowing him to sit for life in the House of Lords.

Other people handed a peerage include:

• Former Conservative Chief Whip Simon Hart

• Former Scotland Secretary Alister Jack

• Former Transport Secretary Mark Harper

• Ex-Attorney General Victoria Prentis

• Former Tory Chief Executive Stephen Massey.

• Ex-Chancellor Jeremy Hunt

• Former Defense Secretary Grant Shapps

• Former Home Secretary James Cleverly

• Former Deputy Foreign Secretary Andrew Mitchell

• Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride

Bar organizations are warning Ottawa that a new penalty regime to be applied to legal professionals — featuring penalties of up to $1.5 million for immigration and refugee lawyers determined by federal officials to have participated in clients’ misrepresentations — will be constitutionally challenged if lawyers are not exempted from the proposed regulations, which are expected to come into force later this year.

The proposed regulations prohibit a legal professional, who represents or advises someone for payment, from misrepresenting or withholding information, advising them to misrepresent or withhold information, or communicating misleading information.

The new administrative penalties regime would apply to the country’s approximately 12,000 immigration consultants and to all immigration lawyers.

The Canadian Bar Association, the law societies of Ontario, B.C. and Newfoundland and Labrador, the Canadian Immigration Lawyers Association (CILA), and the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers (CARL) wrote to Immigration Canada objecting to applying the proposed penalty regime to legal professionals.

The Canadian Immigration Lawyers Association says “the proposed regulations would be unconstitutional and illegal in their application to lawyers.”.

The baseline penalties for the two types of violations are significant: $15,000 for misrepresentation and $5,000 for representation or advice without authorization.

Consequences for those found to have violated the regulations would include Immigration Canada publishing on its website their names and business information, as well as the nature of the violation(s) and the penalties imposed

https://www.law360.ca/ca/articles/2322169/constitutional-clash-brewing-as-ottawa-targets-immigration-bar-with-up-to-1-5-million-in-admin-penalties

Dans tous les domaines, il faut encourager les gens qui font de la qualité.