davetansley

Just in time for the spookiest time of year, a game that features not just ghouls, but also ghosts as well. And spooky haunted turtles.

Ghouls 'n Ghosts (Dai Makaimura in Japan) is a classic 1988 Capcom arcade game and sequel to the highly popular Ghosts 'n Goblins. Like its predecessor, you play Arthur, a knight who must save a princess by battling through six spook-filled levels. Along the way, you collect a variety of weapons (sometimes against your will!), beat bosses, avoid wizards in chests, and generally work your way from left to right. You get two hits per life, with your armour disappearing after the first. To help you out, you can collect a golden set of armour that has a charge attack, but you seldom get a chance to use it.

The arcade original is just gorgeous in every respect, with masterful pixel art graphics, music that is both spooky and catchy, and controls that feel fluid and responsive. Its levels are varied and interesting, and its bosses challenging. In fact, the whole game is a challenge, with the difficulty ramping right up from the end of level 1. You're never given a moment to breathe, as zombies continually spill out of the ground and attack you. Gotta keep those quarters coming! And if you pick up the wrong weapon (basically anything but the knife), you're stuck with it, unless you chance upon a better pick up.

The game was ported all over the place, with varying degrees of success. It came towards the end of the life of the 8-bit micros, so hopes wouldn't have been high... so how did they do? Actually, not bad. Let's take a look.

There's not a lot to pick between the 8-bit and 16-bit micro versions, with each of them suffering similar problems, the worst of which is the limitations of a single-button joystick. This means that firing upwards (an essential part of some levels) is combined with an initial jump, causing you to jump into the enemy you're trying to dispatch!

The Amstrad suffers all of this, but also some pretty gross push scrolling, which makes it difficult to avoid some enemies. It otherwise looks okay, I guess, with colourful, distinct graphics. It controls fairly well, despite the scrolling limitations, but it is definitely the hardest of the three 8-bit micros. Sound is pretty much non-existent in-game, but it has a lovely title screen rendition of the Ghouls 'n Ghosts theme. Shame it couldn't play in-game.

Not a bad effort, if a little clunky.

The C64 version is distinct from the Amstrad and Spectrum, as is fairly common with games from this era. It has much smaller graphics, but some lovely smooth scrolling. Some of its levels feel incredibly sparse, with very few enemies, which makes it a lot easier than the Amstrad version. Unlike other 8-bit versions, the C64 version has in-game music... though, inexplicably, opts for a custom theme rather than the very familiar Ghouls 'n Ghosts music. It's very good, but also feels very out of place...

I start a lot of these Spectrum sections with "you'll have to trust me on this...", and this game is no exception. The Spectrum version shares a lot in common with the Amstrad version, but the overall package is a lot slicker. The scrolling is smooth (at least for a Spectrum), the sound is better, and the control feels fluid and "right". This version, of the three 8-bit micros, feels the most like the arcade. That said, it looks very basic, and is certainly the worst looking of the three, with monochrome graphics that feel sparse and bland. But what did you expect?

Not a bad effort though, and well worth a look for those interested in seeing this ancient machine pushed to its limits. You just need to squint a little...

Sigh. There's just something deeply disappointing about playing Amiga arcade ports from this era. It's how a teacher must feel when an obviously gifted student just phones it in and scrapes a D. Amiga Ghouls 'n Ghosts is that kind of port... It looks kind of okay in stills, but when it moves it reveals itself. Slow, jerky scrolling. Lacklustre colours. A small playfield... Like the C64, it goes its own way for music on level 1, and while the tune is suitably spooky, it just never seems to get going.

Overall, its not a terrible port. Its certainly playable. Its just... the Amiga could do so much more, you know?

Over on the consoles, things were a lot better. Starting with the most basic conversion, that of the Sega Master System, we begin to see a lot more of the original's DNA. The music is here in-game, a plinky plinky chip tune rendition of the original that is perfectly serviceable. The graphics are good and colourful, if a little blocky. It plays really well, and even adds in some light RPG elements in the form of shops in which you can upgrade your equipment. Not sure why this version alone got that addition, but it certainly adds depth.

Overall, I think you'd be happy with this if you were a Master System owner in the late 80s.

Over on the Master System's big brother, we have perhaps the most impressive port of all (though not the most accurate). Programmed by Yuji Naka (of Sonic The Hedgehog fame), the Megadrive port is extremely competent. Everything is here and incredibly faithful to the original. The music is amazing, managing to sound both faithful and unmistakably Megadrive. The graphics are on point, with just a slightly gaudy palette letting it down slightly. Best of all, it plays incredibly well.

If you want to experience just one "interpretative" port (rather than one of the identical or emulated ports), give this a go.

A rare spawn - a Supergrafx version! This little known successor to the PC Engine got very few games, and Ghouls 'n Ghosts was perhaps the most famous. Like the Megadrive, it's a highly faithful and very impressive conversion. Its graphics are perhaps a little more detailed than the Megadrive, with a more refined palette that can sometimes look a little drab. Still, it's a brilliant conversion, and well worth a look (if you can track it down!)

Onto the Sharp X68000 "port"...

It's hard to know what to do with this version (and the Playstation one), since they don't hit the same curiosity triggers as, say, the Amstrad version. It doesn't really feel like a conversion at all, it feels exactly like the arcade game. And with good reason... the X68000 shared a lot of hardware similarities with the arcade games of the time, and was even used by Capcom as the CPS development machine. So of course it feels great.

But we're here to see the brave leaps of faith and the tragic failures of ambition... and this ain't that.

Still, if you want to see a truly arcade perfect port of Ghouls 'n Ghosts, have a look at this...

... Or this. The PlayStation version is, presumably, using some kind of emulation and a dump of the arcade ROM. As such, I'm tempted to disqualify it... but I wanted to include it purely to point out that even this method doesn't always guarantee perfection.

There's something busted about the brightness in this version. It's way too dark. For my screenshots above, I've had to give it a bit of a crank up a notch or two - unscientific, yeah, but otherwise it was very hard to see anything! It could be a problem with my MiSTer, but the few YouTube videos I've seen suggest the same problem...

So there you have it. Ghouls 'n Ghosts, a cool game wherever you play it, and a very hard one at that. Try the Megadrive/Genesis port, if you can try just one.

Happy Halloween! 🎃

I'm not normally one for themed, seasonal gaming... but Halloween seems to lend itself particularly well to playing a particular type of game.

So what are you playing this spooky season?

This year, I'm playing through Castlevania: Dawn of Sorrow (DS version, via the Retroid Pocket 2S). It's not the spookiest entry in the series, but has enough creepy castle exploration to fit the bill.

(Saw this question asked on another popular link aggregation website and it got me thinking)

If you could play one game for the first time all over again, what would you choose? This might be because you want to do it all again, or because you don't think you got enough out of it the first time. It could be experiencing the game exactly as you were back then, or experiencing a game with what you know now.

For me, it's Legend of Zelda: A Link To The Past, experienced exactly as I was back in 1991.

Nothing comes close to how jaw-droppingly amazed I was by that opening sequence. The epic orchestral score, the cinematic rainstorm, creeping around in the dark... it was a generational leap above anything I'd played on 8-bit computers and consoles, and even the Megadrive. I'd love to play it again without thirty plus years of Nintendo/Zelda knowledge, or without knowing about the dark world.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/4790038

I got the new Retroid Pocket 2S in clear black. It worked out about 105 quid delivered, and took just over a week to arrive.

It's a lovely little device, with some really nice sticks and triggers. But it really hammered home how easy it is to set up a Miyoo Mini Plus (which was largely just a case of copying over the ROMs). This one comes pretty much barebones, and it's up to you to install all the emus and a decent front end. So you end up with a weird combination of Retroarch and stand alone emus, and a confusing set of different configs. Retroarch alone is an absolute beast to understand and get right...it seems to have a slippery complexity that is very difficult to hold in your brain.

That said, once it's set up, it is lovely. I'm using Daijisho as a front end, and it pretty much hides all the underlying complications. 4:3 systems look great on the tiny screen, and it runs up to Dreamcast really well, with some GC games running nicely. The only downside is that the PSP's 16:9 screen looks a little titchy letter-boxed on the screen, but it's a small price to pay for portable Outrun 2.

Overall, very impressed... though concerned that this is my second retro handheld and I'm already thinking about things that would make me pick up a third. These things are compelling, eh?

Commando (released as Senjō no Ōkami in Japan, Wolf of the Battlefield) is a 1985 Capcom arcade shooter. Word to the wise: Commando isn't based on the Schwarzenegger movie of the same name - that's some false knowledge I've carried round with me for close to forty years... oh, how I've embarrassed myself at dinner parties...

Commando is a vertically scrolling run-and-gun shooter where you play "Super Joe", a one-man army pitted against the endless ravenous hordes of whatever country was the mid-80s enemy du jour at the time. You have a gun with unlimited ammo, and a finite supply of grenades with which to dispatch your foes. While the gun can fire in any direction, the grenades only launch upwards, which creates a need for careful positioning in order to use them effectively.

The game is split into levels, and each level ends with a heavily fortified building that spews out a huge number of enemies that must be defeated before you progress.

It's a cool game, one of the first of its kind. It's also fast and frantic, and doesn't really reward slow and methodical play. You've almost got to treat it as an auto-scroller, never slowing down, just moving forward and spraying your gun wherever you can. If you don't, you risk being overwhelmed by the constantly respawning bad guys.

It was a genre defining title, spawning many imitators (such as Ikari Warriors, the home Rambo games, and countless others; as well as a 198 sequel, Mercs). It was also extremely tough, especially the unforgiving end-of-level sequences. A real coin muncher.

In terms of ports, it got more conversions than a corrupt third-world regime has cannon fodder mercenaries. And I've looked at them all... war is hell, man.

So, lock and load, we've got a lot to get through...

We begin this epic journey with a familiar friend: the Amstrad. But it's not up here because it's terrible, far from it. It's actually a pretty decent conversion, albeit not as good as the Spectrum or C64. Like the Spectrum, it suffers a bit from its one-button joystick, meaning that grenades are fired by holding down the button, which leaves you a little vulnerable for a moment. I think I prefer the C64's approach of using the space bar for this.

The graphics are bold and clear, if a little monotonous; the game is hard, but fair; and the sound is... okay. Overall, it's fine. Not the best, not the worst.

The Spectrum port of Commando is good, seriously. It just looks bloody awful. Not sure why they chose yellow as the background colour, but they did and you end up feeling like you're wading in custard. It's not the only port to feel like this.

If you can ignore the stinky visuals, there's a great game underneath. It is fast, similar in pace to the arcade and has a similar frantic feeling. It throws hordes of enemies at you, just like the arcade... no idea how the Spectrum keeps up! Bullets are very visible, making it feel fair, even the sound is okay.

Overall, a great effort!

I think C64 owners would claim Commando as their very own, and with good reason. It's very much a C64 staple.

It's the theme music, you see? A Rob Hubbard classic, famously knocked up in 12 hours. And it's great! But beyond the awesome SID soundtrack, the game is amazing as well. Smooth, fluid, fair, fast, it just feels right. On the 8-bit micros, at least, it is the closest by far to the arcade.

You could, perhaps, argue that it is a little bit... brown. But hey, so was the original. And it worked for literally every Xbox 360 game, so I'm prepared to let it slide.

Well worth a look, even today!

We leave the well-trod paths of 8-bit machines and enter the hinterlands...

The BBC Micro, for those not raised in the UK in the 80s, was a machine that was only ever owned by the children of geography teachers. It was never meant to be a games machine, it was meant to be for learning or a tool for recreating the Doomsday book (don't ask).

Nevertheless, it turned in a commendable effort on its Commando homework, a solid B-.

Yet another victim of the yellow backdrop curse, this effort is garish and bright. It is also pretty slow, with jerky movement. That limitation kind of changes how you play the game. It becomes more intentional, less frantic. You can take your time a little, plot out the best place to stand and fight. In that respect, it's quite enjoyable.

So a reasonable effort, if a little... yellow.

Sadly, the same can't be said about the MSX version, which isn't so much a war hero, as a war crime.

It looks passable in still form, with colourful graphics that are reminiscent of the arcade. It has that old MSX thing of a multi-colour main sprite and monochrome enemies, but looks mostly fine. Sadly, it all comes apart when it moves... the main sprite jerks from character block to character block, the screen moves similarly badly. It's like viewing Commando through a flashing strobe light. The music is discordant and jarring, and plays in half-hearted 20 second bursts before giving up. Really off-putting.

It's a shame, because it has all the elements of the arcade in one form or another. They're just put together in such a way that makes playing it feel like having a seizure.

Enough with the garish 8-bit ports, let's take a look at what the 16-bit powerhouses can do...

The Amiga turns in a solid effort. Pretty boring really, leaving me very little to comment on. It's Commando... slick, smooth graphics, solid controls, a nice rendition of the arcade music. It's enjoyable to play, but doesn't really push any limits...

If you want solid, authentic competency, this is the port for you. But where's the fun in that?

Similar to the Amiga version, the Atari ST phones in another competent port. In fact, I actually prefer this version to the Amiga version. It feels looser, smoother, a bit faster maybe? Regardless, there's not much in it, with both versions having near identical graphics. The ST music is a bit chippier, but it still sounds authentic.

Another great port!

Regular readers of these posts will know that what I value more than lazily applied raw power, is moxie. And this port has moxie in spades. It's an Intellivision, for goodness sake! From 1979! It has 1K of RAM! This machine has no business running a game like Commando... and yet...

Okay, it doesn't look much like the original, with the chunky colourful sprites being whittled back to one colour stick men. But it moves kinda like Commando and it sounds kinda like Commando and it plays kinda like Commando. All of it powered by sheer moxie alone!

It's not the best port here by a long way, but it is perhaps the most impressive. Importantly, it's also very playable, enjoyable even! It has moxie, see?

Now, there's moxie and there's wishful thinking, and the Atari 2600 (hailing from 1977) was more of the latter and less of the former. If the Intellivision port embodies the spirit of Commando, the Atari 2600 embodies the spirit of a two sentence description of Commando. It is super basic, super stripped back, and it doesn't really work, sadly.

The graphics are limited, with yet more liberal use of yellow; the movement is perfunctory; the bullets frequently go missing and can't be avoided, and it's annoying to play rather than quirky.

There are good 2600 games, games that are enjoyable even today, but this isn't one of them. Well, what do you expect? The console is basically just resistors!

Luckily for Atari console fans, the Atari 7800 version is actually quite good. It's a proper grown-up console version, comparable to the NES port, and very playable. It has all the bits and pieces from the arcade, and adds pick-ups to give you a more powerful gun, or a knife to enable hand to hand killing (run into enemies).

It looks great and moves smoothly and, if you're playing the original cartridge, it uses an extra POKEY chip to give enhanced sound (one of only two 7800 games to do so).

The NES version of Commando is probably the best of the bunch, possessing that slick console feel that leads to such great coin-op conversions.

Superficially, it's a solid recreation of the arcade. It looks great, it sounds as good as can be expected, it is smooth, fast and frantic. It sometimes pushes the limits of the NES too far though, with the abundance of on-screen sprites causing some pretty epic sprite flicker. But you barely notice it in the heat of the action.

Like several other NES conversions (Rygar, Strider), this one adds a number of little extras to prolong interest. It has powerups that can be collected for points or to make your weapons more powerful. Also, hidden around the levels and revealed by a well-placed grenade throw, are ladders. If you climb these ladders down, you're taken to a hidden bunker, containing either hostages, enemies or pick-ups. It doesn't add a great deal to the game, other than the need to locate these ladders, and you could even argue that it detracts from the frantic pace. But it's an interesting example of how developers tried to add a little bit extra to coin-op conversions back then.

So there you have it, Commando. If you want to experience it today, try the C64 or NES versions for realsies, or the Intellivision version for interest.

I feel as if I've been hanging out at the arse-end of the 80s a lot recently, comparing ports on computers that had no business running them. I've long suspected that if you want to see 8-bit micros at their best, you're better served hanging around in 1986 rather than 1989. Things were so much more achievable back then...

So, with a robust tailwind of realistic expectations at our backs, let's take a look at Tehkan's 1984 arcade hit, Bomb Jack.

Bomb Jack is one of those much-loved arcade classics that everyone knows but which never quite reached the same revered status as earlier hits like Donkey Kong or Pacman. It came at that inflection point in the arcades where single-screen, high score games were being replaced by more complex, sprawling coin-munchers. A kind of last-hurrah for wonderful simplicity.

And Bomb jack truly has simplicity. It is played over five backdrops, where you play "Jack", a caped superhero, who is tasked with defusing a number of bombs that are sprinkled around the level. As you begin to collect them, a single bomb's fuse will ignite. Collect this, and you get a 200 point bonus and cause another bomb to light. Getting the highest score becomes a matter of strategically collecting the fizzing bombs and avoiding the unlit bombs. Or you could just collect bombs regardless and forgo the extra points.

Standing in your way is an array of bad guys, from killer robots to um... birds. But you're not entirely defenseless, as you can pick up a "P" power-up that renders all enemies vulnerable and stationary, kind of like the power pill in Pacman.

Ultimately, Bomb Jack is a game about movement. Jack can jump high into the air and, with a tap of the fire button, float slowly back down to earth, enabling you to collect the higher up bombs. This requires a bit of skill to master, and you'll need to use the float mechanic to avoid the screen's enemies.

To emphasise this vertical motion, Bomb Jack's cabinet comes with a 3:4, "tate" mode monitor.

Overall, it's a fun, bright score-chaser game, well worth a quick look. But how did it look on the home versions?

Oof. Slipping sheepishly into the hated first slot is the C64 version, easily the worst of the bunch. There's no reason why it should be, it just feels full of unforced errors. Like how chunky everything is. The Bomb Jack sprite and the enemies are just too big. It's difficult to move, difficult to soar, difficult to sneak in for swooping bomb collection moves. It's also muddy and grim, with some backgrounds being inexplicably the same colour as the bombs.

Uniquely, among the original home ports, this version has a clunky rendition of Jean-Michel Jarre's Magnetic Fields playing in the background. But not even the Synth Pop King can save it from its grizzly fate.

Listen, as an old ZX Spectrum advocate, I appreciate moxie. And the C16 version of Bomb Jack more than makes up for its technical shortcomings with a generous dollop of moxy and chutzpah. It's ambitious in a way that 16k machines shouldn't be, and for that, it merits a flamboyant doff of the cap.

But for all that it plays a surprisingly okay game of Bomb Jack, it's not amazing. For a start, it cuts down the number of backdrops to one or two, with subsequent levels being rearrangements of the platforms over the same background image. It's also very grey and dark, and it suffers the same chunky-monkey shortcomings as its big brother, the C64.

Still, B+ for effort.

A bad day for the Commodore brothers...

While the C16 achieved a lot with precious little, the Amiga does sod all with a great deal. It feels like one of those early Amiga ports where the devs weren't quite up to speed with the powerhouse they were coding for, but it was actually released in 1988, two years after the 8-bit ports. For a game released in the middle of the Amiga's life, it plays remarkably badly.

Movement is slow, laboured, stuttering. The graphics are bland. The three-bar theme music is infuriating... overall, a bad, bad port.

Sidling up alongside the Amiga version, wearing a self-satisfied smirk on its face, is the Atari ST version. Normally the sickly cousin of its 16-bit rival, the Atari ST somehow manages to win this inconsequential encounter. Its port looks virtually identical to the Amiga version, but it moves so much better. It is fast, fluid and plays largely the same as the arcade. Even the AY sound is inexplicably better.

Word to the wise: By default, the ST version has "Mouse" as its initial control scheme. Yeah, I don't get it either. If you don't spot this, you may almost write it off without realising it's actually pretty good!

What's this? An Amstrad port sneaking ahead of the pack? Yep, it doesn't happen often, but the Amstrad version of Bomb Jack is actually pretty solid. It's appears to be based on the Spectrum version, but with a characteristically Amstrad-esque colour scheme (garish).

It plays well, fast and fluid and with plenty of space to enjoy the soaring movement. Overall, not bad!

There's something uniquely reassuring about a console port, especially when viewed alongside home micro ports. They tend to have an extra level of polish, a feeling that the devs haven't just spent all their time working out how to get the thing to run, but also how it feels when it does run.

The Gameboy port is a lot like that. It's Bomb Jack, sure enough, shrunk down, monochromed into that love-it-or-hate-it Gameboy green... but it feels so much better than the other ports. Movement is fluid, at a solid framerate. It feels more balanced. It has continues! Overall, it feels like a more modern experience.

Then again, this version was released in 1992, a full 6 years after most of the 8-bit ports, and a lot of "user experience" water had passed under the bridge in that time.

So for all that it is a great port, I'm going to have to mark it down slightly. Sure, it's a fun version of Bomb Jack, but why wouldn't it be? It was released in the same year as Streets of Rage 2!

Blimey! Taking the top spot, surprisingly, is the ZX Spectrum version... no, wait, hear me out...

I know I come across as a bit of a Speccy apologist and, I admit, I served my time in the Platform Wars of the 80s. I've made baseless arguments about the Spectrum's capabilities that fly in the face of sense and logic at times. But, this time, I feel such hyperbole is warranted.

See, Bomb Jack feels ideally suited to the Spectrum. It doesn't require any fancy scrolling, it is bright, it demands a reasonably high res screen and a fairly nimble CPU to move things around quickly. And those are things the Spectrum can do.

Sure, our rubber-keyed pal opts for "any colour as long as it is black" for the sprites and platforms, but it kind of works. It lets the backdrops be outrageously colourful, just like the arcade. And it plays well too, moving just like the original, or so it seems to me. It feels right in a way that the Amiga and C64 ports don't. Even the humble 48k sound isn't terrible... bleeps and bloops and warbling jumps.

I don't say this often, but if you're going to play a port of Bomb Jack, you should definitely check out the Spectrum version...

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1312535

Some games arrive right on time, while some games arrive later than they should... but some, a rare few, arrive way too early. Like Micronaut One.

You've probably never heard of Micronaut One, and with good reason. It was a single platform, 1987 title that was released with little fanfare and to modest acclaim, on a platform largely only popular in Europe. It wasn't a sequel itself, nor did it generate a sequel or a franchise. It simply arrived, enjoyed a moment in the sun, then disappeared...

To my mind, this is a great shame. Not because Micronaut One was an amazing game (it was more technically intriguing, in my opinion, than amazingly playable), but because Micronaut One was so far ahead of its time that it deserves to be more widely known.

Even without digging into the finer details, Micronaut One sounds surface-level impressive. It is a first-person, solid 3D science fiction game, on the ZX Spectrum, of all things. In it, you pilot a craft around the winding, intersecting corridors of some great ship, manipulating the energy levels of various computer nodes in an effort to stop an overload.

As you travel around, you encounter various fauna that inhabit the ship with you. These mostly take the form of "Scrim", an insect lifeform with a three stage growth cycle - from invulnerable eggs, to creeping larvae, to egg-laying flies.

If you fail to destroy these creatures, they inevitably mature and start forming webs that block the corridors. Eventually, you'll find your route between the overloading nodes is impossible, and overload will be imminent...

If you know the ZX Spectrum, you can see that it's already pretty ambitious. It moves at a nimble pace in flawless 3D, looks great for a Spectrum game, and has a compelling game loop and tense atmosphere as you struggle to keep on top of the replicating Scrim.

But it's the extra details that make this game especially impressive, and well worth a few moments of your time in 2023. In parts, it feels like a game from much later, 1997 rather than 1987 say. It's almost Descent, 10 years before Descent even existed.

It has a menu/pointer configuration system. This may seem old hat, but back then this was virtually unheard of in 8-bit games. This system allows you to configure the game down to the smallest detail and lets you navigate the complex mapping system. It even lets you change the colour of various parts of the UI!

Next, it has a kind of mini-wiki built into it, giving background details on the ship and its inhabitants. Honestly, this was so unheard of back then, I can barely think of another example, let alone one this well presented.

In game, you're giving access to a map, and on that map you can set waypoints which the game will then plot routes between. As you're playing, your HUD will display an arrow telling you which way to go... again, this feels like something from the late 90s!

On top of all that, as well as the main game, Micronaut One also lets you play a racing mode, in which you compete against a "pacer" through the twisting corridors of the ship. It has leaderboards, various levels of pacer speed... It's amazing!

So, is it the best ZX Spectrum game ever?

No, sadly not. Despite all of its gratuitous innovation, it definitely has its shortcomings, some of which are especially vexing to a modern eye.

It is clunky to control, as you can't turn around in the corridors. Instead, you need to stop and then hit reverse, flipping your direction. This can lead to lots of alignment issues, as there are no strafe keys. Also, the menu can be difficult to navigate, requiring you move the "mouse" from side to side of the screen to back out to the game. And the sound is typically Speccy... ie, bleeps and burps and not much else.

But all that's wrong with it feels like something that could be fixed with a couple of months of extra work and a couple of decades of hindsight (strafe keys, a back button in the menu).

It feels like a shame that Micronaut One never got a chance to get an Amiga sequel, or a PS1 reboot. Instead, we should content ourselves with the fleeting moment of brilliance that was all this curious little game ever became.

#ZXSpectrum #Retrogaming

Everyone knows about Final Fight, right? This 1989 Capcom beat 'em up feels almost genre defining, even though it was not the first beat 'em up of its type. Nevertheless, it cast a long shadow over games that came after it, especially those released by Capcom.

And with good reason. Final Fight is awesome, even today. It's a simple enough concept - gang kidnaps ex-Street Fighter and new Mayor Mike Haggar's daughter, so Mike and his pals Cody and Guy undertake a mission to save her. Said mission involves beating up fools, swinging various weapons, taking part in a wrestling match at one point, and eating lots of food out of trashcans. You can play as either of the three pals, and even bring a pal of your own along as a second player.

It's a lot of fun, and well worth a look today. It hurls hordes of bad guys at you that you slice through with kicks and punches and special moves. Nothing quite beats the feeling of your guy disappearing under a pile of ruffians, only to emerge with a cyclone kick to send the bastards flying.

But it was also a technical powerhouse, with massive sprites, detailed backgrounds and a ton of stuff on screen at once. So how the hell would this behemoth fit into a humble ZX Spectrum? Grab a trash-chicken and let's find out...

Let's deal with the Amstrad and Spectrum versions together, since they share a lot of the same DNA, not to mention failings.

Okay, there's no two ways about this. 1991 was way late in the life of the 8-bit home micros. They were about two generations behind the curve at this point, and time had not been kind. So any hope of getting a decent port of Final Fight onto these two was wishful thinking at best. Yet, somehow, someone thought it might be a good idea...

There are two ways you can look at these versions.

First, you can judge them on merit. And, honestly, they come up wanting. They're both terrible games, by any measure. To their credit, both attempt to copy the arcade to the best of their abilities, including all three playable characters, all stages, most moves, a representative sample of the animation frames... but it's this ambition that cripples both ports. Because the result is a slow, jerky, indistinct mess (especially on the monochrome Spectrum) that is really difficult to play. Moves take forever to animate, collision detection is terrible, every single-enemy fight is more like a boss fight in the length of time it takes to play out. There are glitches aplenty and both versions share a quirk that sees your character getting frozen to the spot after every punch or kick, standing there like Mitch McConnell while the enemies pile on. On top of that, weapons are useless, Cody and Guy are useless, and the game generally feels like a kind of torture.

But there's another way of looking at them... because there is clearly some achievement there. They are both recognisably Final Fight. The sprites, the locations, the enemies, all reasonable representations of Final Fight. They play like Final Fight, albeit Final Fight shot through a prism of shit. They attempt big boy feats they have no business doing, like the animated train on level two, or the wrestling arena. They both have the fancy animated intro... these are clearly not mindless cash grabs. There was talent here, talent that pushed these two machines beyond what anyone would have thought possible in 1982. It just feels like wasted effort.

Worth a look for novelty value alone.

I've kept the C64 version apart from the other two because it is a very different beast, and a very different kind of bad. As is often the case, the C64 went its own way and knocked out a port that feels inspired by Final Fight at best. The levels are similar only, the sprites are smaller, the whole feel of the game is different.

It has a weird kind of floaty feel to it. There's this strange quirk where landing a kick will only have an effect a short time later. So you'll kick a dude, you'll get a sound effect, then about half a second after that, the dude will fly backwards. It's almost surreal.

The thing is, this port almost feels like it could have been a decent game. Just rounding off the sharp edges would have helped a lot, and it could have been a fun two player beat 'em up in the Renegade style. It's just not Final Fight.

Surely things are better on the 16-bit micros, right?

Well, yes and no. The Amiga port is clearly superior to the 8-bits. It has some great intro music, the graphics are colourful, the sprites massive and reasonably well-animated. It just has that undeniable Amiga-arcade-port quality of something feeling off. It doesn't feel fluid or hectic like the arcade. There are fewer enemies at once, the control is hampered by a one-button joystick and feel sluggish, and the difficulty feels off, with stunlocks happening far too often.

But it's not the worst Amiga arcade port out there, and would probably serve you well if you were looking for bit of quick mayhem.

The same can't be said of the Atari ST port, sadly. This version looks similar to the Amiga, but with fewer colours. It has some terrible character-block scrolling that wouldn't look out of place on the Amstrad. And the sound is about Spectrum quality. Not the ST's finest hour.

Over on the console, and things look a little better, as you might expect.

Starting with the SNES version, which is definitely the runt of the litter. It's not terrible, it plays pretty well, it just feels cut down. That's because it is... only two characters available (sob, poor Guy). No two player mode. Some weird early-90s censorship that saw various female enemies replaced by cookie-cutter male hoodlums. A whole missing level. Some missing level transitions. And a generally drab looking appearance.

Not awful, but not great by any means.

It should be noted that Japan got a version called "Final Fight Guy" which returned Guy to the game... at the expense of Cody. So close.

Let's end on two high notes.

The Mega CD version of Final Fight is superb! From the animated, voiced intro, to the faithful reproduction of the gameplay, to the extras that this version includes, everything feels complete. It plays well, it sounds amazing, it is the first port so far that actually captures the essence of the arcade incredibly well. It has lots of enemies on screen at once (not quite as many of the coin-op, but better than the SNES).

If I was compelled to level but one criticism, it would be that the colour palette feels a little off, which is probably a limitation of the Megadrive itself. It just leaves things looking a bit... gritty.

But that shouldn't deter you! This port is awesome and well worth a play!

But for all that the Mega CD version is great, it's not my favourite...

That accolade goes to, surprisingly, the Gameboy Advance!

The GBA got a port titled "Final Fight One", which is basically a port of the arcade, so it counts. Unlike the SNES, all characters are present, as is a two player mode via link cable. All stages are here, and the game generally looks a lot more vibrant. Due to the nature of the GBA screen, it does feel a little "zoomed in", but you get used to it.

Where this port succeeds the most is in how it plays. It is fluid as hell, fast and easy to control. You get the same frantic feeling as the arcade, with lots of enemies flying all over the screen. The music really adds to this feel, with some cool renditions of the arcades tunes.

Overall, a really complete package and well worth playing today!

So what are your memories of Final Fight? Did you suffer through the Spectrum version or were you lucky enough to get the Mega CD port?