commiunism

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Yet both are enemies of the workers, play into opportunism, the vast majority of their policies are dictated by business donors and maintain the system that most of us can agree is killing the planet and people. Any minor concessions (that have already been repealed by the way, wonder how that works /s) might make things a little bit comfortable, but is essentially nothing in comparison.

Stop rallying behind the puppets of capitalists, look past the liberal abstraction to see things for what they really are even if media says otherwise.

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It depends heavily on what kind of commie you are actually.

  • If you're an ultra, you're likely too busy shitting on other communists from the comfort of the armchair to look for a relationship

  • If you're a ML or Maoist, you probably don't want a relationship to spend more time "reading theory" (watching youtube slop)

  • If you're a Trotskyite, you're likely already in a sex offender registry

  • If you're a Bordigist, you're playing hard mode when it comes to getting a relationship as you refuse to be a usufructuary traitor to the health of the species (you avoid drinking and smoking and all like the plague)

  • If you're a revolutionary Marxist who has read theory, then you'll drive people away with your revolutionary aura

  • If you're a Marxist who hasn't read theory, then you're a liberal who shouldn't have any problems finding a relationship

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 week ago

Instructions unclear, turned into an insufferable Marxist and now I don't have anyone to talk to

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Holy shit why is every .worlder so aggressive? I don't know how you derived such a conclusion from my original comment, so let me explain:

Proletarians, soldiers, peasants and so on overthrew the Tsarists, and in this popular front of sorts proletariat had demands for the liberal provisional government, such as Russia's withdrawal from WW1, land and labor reforms - things of that nature. The provisional liberal government failed to meet any of that (either via stalling or evading action), and they also didn't withdraw from the war, and these reasons definitely contributed to November revolution.

Simplified to not make it too long, but that's the core point - nothing to do with Marxist ideals.

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Not OSRS either, where Scythe is one of the most powerful mega-rare weapons

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)
  1. The best way to 'convert' someone is for them to literally "figure it out" by themselves and start reading political theory via their own volition to grasp the world better rather than get their worldview from inconsistent, barely coherent liberal media slop. It's impossible to 'convert' purely via a singular argument, just look at linux users trying to convert entrenched windows users.

  2. The comment was a reference to how radicalized socialist workers (who'd make up military core and who had demands like worker councils, socialization of industry) would team up with liberal elements in a popular front type of way, only for this front after winning to immediately betray and sideline the worker's demands. Historical examples: French revolutions, overthrow of Fascist Italy, February revolution in Russia, etc.

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Revolution will be achieved through collaboration with liberal moderates (hitlerites)

[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Not surprising - traditionalist liberals attacking LGBT people because they dare defy the holy family structure is very common.

I doubt this has anything to do with religion though, apart from it being used as a convenient tool to add credence to the rhetoric. More people being born and raised via unpaid labor of their parents (usually mothers) means more future workers for the ruling class to extract labor value from, which usually means more economic growth and more bodies for when war breaks out.

view more: ‹ prev next ›