chuymatt

I was watching it from afar. As I recall, he bailed on his presentation and got back to it after being talked to (and threatened?) and presented his schlock. Now, not saying the guy was at all blameless, but I watched him presenting and thought to myself, ‘this guy doesn’t believe this stuff at all’.

It pissed me off that the folks in the US were not seeing the whole picture.

Which was proven to cause ulcers by an abrasive scientist drinking a culture and getting them.

The best sound design team. I also love the ability of the visual design team to give a true feeling of scale and weight to things.

Hurt me harder, daddy Canada!

Fine. But genocide has a meaning.

Tiananmen Square was debunked?

I mean, I was alive when the pics came out. Been aware of the censorship. Had friends from China and friends who worked there tell me about the complete avoidance of the subject.

Oh, and I’m not a bot, though you could be protecting your psyche by saying everyone who pushes back on this is.

It is just as foolish to not admit to the atrocities done by one government as it is for any other.

Human psychology.

Wait. What rule?

Nazis?

Weird. Mine is the only comment I see.

With two separate parts of it while being connected, it makes me wonder if it is some sort of electric heated Cutter

No, but it gives him a reason to be read and considered. Taking anyone’s ideas just because they said them is… problematic to say the least.

I am just trying to give you a bit more context than you seem willing to find, and, as everyone who has responded in this thread seems to note, you are writing responses that seem bizarrely … aggressive?

I mean, I’m not wed to the idea, nor am I to all the man’s writings, but you seem extremely set against him with no explanation.