If it improves the President's approval rating, doesn't that suggest that it's something Americans need or want?
"[...] I'm not going to do it. Why would I?"
Indeed. Why help the American people, Congressman?
charonn0
joined 1 year ago
Is it antidemocratic to disqualify Trump from office and deny him a place on the ballot?
Third parties are often denied ballot access. Is that antidemocratic?
What a stupid idea.
(Apply liberally to both sides of debate.)
If your business can't survive without paying slave wages then your business shouldn't survive.
It's telling that no member of the Supreme Court was willing to put their name on that decision.
I tend to support this idea. If inputting copyrighted materials isn't infringement then neither should taking the output be.
As I've been trying to explain, confusion is not the only basis for a trademark claim.
Are you being willfully fucking obtuse?
No. And I have no interest in discussing this with you further if you can't do so respectfully.
Trademarks include words, phrases, and symbols.
Well, I'm only familiar with US law on the subject. NZ might see things differently.
But in the US, dilution of a famous mark doesn't necessarily mean confusion. For example, you couldn't use Apple's famous white apple logo even for a company that had nothing to do with technology.
Confusion isn't the only issue. There's also trademark dilution.
“The president is elected by the entire nation, and it should be the entire nation who determines who they want for president, whether they are guilty of insurrection or not,” Bobb said during an interview on Real America’s Voice. “It’s up to the people.”
When was the last time a Republican won the popular vote?
Is it the one where Sideshow Bob runs for mayor?