charonn0

joined 1 year ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago (7 children)

It's probably not an eviction notice, but a "comply or vacate" notice. Journalists often confuse "eviction notice", which is a court order, with the sort of formal written demand notices that tenants are entitled to receive.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago

It will vary by state, but generally:

When only one of the two parties is unwilling to continue the employer-employee relationship, it is obvious who is the moving party. If employment was still available to the claimant and the claimant refused to continue working, then the claimant is the moving party. If the employer will not allow the claimant to continue work, even though the claimant wants to, then the employer is the moving party.

https://edd.ca.gov/en/uibdg/Voluntary_Quit_VQ_5/

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

A system being slow and inefficient makes defrauding that system similarly slow and inefficient. To affect an election run on paper ballots you have to somehow physically alter or insert thousands or millions of pieces of paper without being detected. This will mean spending large amounts of time and money and must necessarily involve numerous people.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 8 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Manual in person voting is not easily scammed on a scale that can swing an election. The slow, inefficient, in person, physical process is a security feature.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 8 points 5 months ago

I would say that "electronic voting" means that the ballot itself is digital rather than physical. So, scantrons are not electronic voting and voter registries/ID/etc. are not ballots in the first place.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 5 months ago

Plan 9 from the Human Race

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago

Of course not!

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Mine was "banal".

Sounds like "canal".

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 31 points 5 months ago

A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. This prohibition applies to both professional and personal conduct. A judge must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny and accept freely and willingly restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen.

https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges

Not that SCOTUS is held to the same code of conduct that all other federal judges are held to, of course.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 9 points 5 months ago

Flowering and fruiting plants generally need bees, birds, etc. for pollination and seed spreading.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 81 points 5 months ago

Moisturize me!

view more: ‹ prev next ›