brain_pan

joined 1 year ago
[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

he does not think about lemmy, we should likewise think of him less

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

perhaps it's not possible; the crunch strategy isn't working (and is grinding up and spitting out devs)

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago

fr

Reddit Exodus: "reddit is being corporate and shitty and greedy, time to bounce"

Facebook shows up: "oh, let's let them; in fact, we should be happy that they're coming to the fediverse! only good things can come from this"

like it's as if y'all forgot the thing that just happened; why are you all so quick to give the corporation that only cares for money a chance

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 0 points 1 year ago

you are an example of why they're so strict about it

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, it was never "in favor"; as far as I know, it had always been a slur

I can't see how OP was "failed by moderation"; I assume the instance they were on had a zero tolerance policy for such language, and honestly someone with a blog on the internet that had a twitter account probably should have known that that word was a slur and still is

maybe they'll realize why they got banned and figure out that "jokes" like that aren't tolerable, but with how they reacted here I don't know

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

I'd think that most OG lemmy users were people like that, so it's not "small"

[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

imo, the dicey part of the matter is "what amount of the AI's dataset is made up of actual images of children"