boovard

joined 1 year ago
[–] boovard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think that it was him who decided that it was necessary for the scene, though he might not have been against it. Production would not agree to loose money on multiple takes if they did not want the Jackman abs.

Edit: I agree that it's a completely irresponsible practice though!

[–] boovard@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You also just put God and it would work for three religions plus their derivatives

[–] boovard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And using a platform he bought to promote his ideas? Is having too much money free speech?

[–] boovard@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (15 children)

Well maybe it's just a reflexion of his interior self, expressing the piece of shit he was

[–] boovard@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And they all look like creepy smooth plastic dolls...

[–] boovard@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (16 children)

I'm just sad I have an Nvidia GPU 😢

[–] boovard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I agree this is a good practice and would love to see it more, Carrefour is not a role model. They reportedly shrinkflatted quite heavily on their own brands in recent history. So it's a bit cynical from them..