bitofhope

joined 1 year ago
[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 5 points 10 months ago

Yea but you (rightly) consider every act that doesn't put your creation as the highest priority a crime.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I have a lot of trust in ChatGPT's ability to make things worse even if they're already bad.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Look at me, I'm a philantropist! I non-bindingly pledge to probably promise that if possible and convenient, I can be considered to essentially intend to effectively donate up to half of my arguable net worth to a cause one might consider charitable.

Oh and a legal defence fund for unfairly maligned non-sex offender friends of Jeffrey Epstein counts as a charity, by the way.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 9 points 10 months ago

Ah yes, "real" musicians turned their nose up at digital music.

Now let me tell you about how making music on a computer doesn't involve years of practice to become proficient. Using a digital audio workstation is basically the same as typing "club banger in the style of Avicii, billboard hot 100, high quality, big boobs, crisp production, lots of bass, danceable" in a prompt box.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am buying it. I don't think @corbin@awful.systems is pro AI art, just that countermeasures like Glaze and Nightshade are not great either, and I agree.

Artists don’t care about this or need it to be.

I care about it. Some artists use Debian. Please don't shit on people who care about software freedom, even if you don't.

Making artwork unusable by exploitative machine learning models is cool and based, but using a proprietary tool that's itself made by from the same pool of exploited artists' work is less so.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 11 points 10 months ago

I think that's roughly the idea, except replace "desk" with "penis".

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

They've gone from math pets to math woodland creatures now?

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 12 points 10 months ago

So if you read Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality, and thought...

I did read HPOMR and I also thought!

"You know, HPMOR is pretty good

OK, I didn't exactly think that. But go on.

so far as it goes; but Harry is much too cautious and doesn't have nearly enough manic momentum,

Dunno about Harry, but the story as a whole could have done with some momentum, manic or otherwise.

his rationality lectures aren't long enough, and all of his personal relationships are way way way too healthy."

Nobody in their right mind would ever think any of this.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 10 points 10 months ago

OTOH "mediocre dunces" is an amazing phrase and I will continue to refer to TREACLES as such.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 4 points 10 months ago

Sorry Jamie, but I can imagine any AI company to be pretty damn bad, so in this case they're not really worse than that.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

[TODO (left in intentionally because I don't have time to fill in these details): Put more motivation / justification here: Bowling Alone stats, stats about religion making people happier, some reference about religion making people believe untrue things. Friendships formed by repeated random bumping into people, thus regular events important]

The fuck is this? Why are you publishing an article if you don't have the time to write an article, asshole? Who's enforcing a deadline for posting this drivel on less wrong dot com?

If these things are so superfluous they can be dropped from the article, drop them. At least take the few minutes to rewrite that into something like "I haven't had the time to look deeper into XYZ, maybe someone taking this more seriously should actually do that."

view more: ‹ prev next ›