axx

joined 1 month ago
[–] axx@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Why? Refugees welcome.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago

That's the problem with this generation, no capacity to appreciate delayed dissatisfaction!

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Le titre en question :

Dérapage des finances publiques : Gabriel Attal estime devant le Sénat avoir pris des « décisions fortes »

L’ancien premier ministre a par ailleurs défendu son ministre de l’économie, Bruno Le Maire, jugeant « scandaleux » le « procès politique, médiatique » qui lui est fait, et saluant son « obsession de désendetter la France ».

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a perspective than can only be held in a political system that has devolved to a two-party system.

If you step out of that, it stops making sense. A democracy allows for people to express their actual opinion. Anything less than that is not a proper democracy. I'd argue there are no "third parties" in a proper democracy.

You might be saying that the American regime is illegitimate, it's unclear.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Entirely agree. The people responsible for trump getting votes are the people voting for Trump.

Tactical voting is bullshit of the highest order and the undeniable sign of a fucked up political and voting system, not some sort of political astuteness.

If your voting system can't allow people to express their true choice, you should throw it away. Yes, that means the majority of voting systems around the world are bad and need to be changed. Getting people to recognise that this is even an issue in the first place is a huge battle.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Excellent, thanks for sharing this.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

This tells you more how disconnected and entitled at the lack of personal consequences these people are than how stupid they are, I think.

They're not dumb, they're just convinced it's not going to cause them any personal damage to say this.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

Faut aussi penser que ça marche dans l'autre sens : ces gens-là n'arrivent dans l'ensemble pas à comprendre pourquoi nos générations n'achètent pas.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pas touche au marché ok? (À dire sur le ton de "pas touche à la 'oiture !")

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, we need to stop thinking "battery" and broaden to energy storage as a whole, which can take many more forms (wind up a big coil! Push things uphill!).

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You could actually put some thought into what you devote the energy to, and if wanting to do a blockchain based system, run Stellar or Ethereum nodes. Though they don't use Proof of Work, so it would not use that much energy, relatively. You could offer supercomputing as a service that run batch jobs during the peak hours though.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, "economy" fundamentally is the allocation of limited resources, if something is limited at a point when it's needed, then economical doesn't sound like the wrong word to use? (I'm aware economical means cheap, BTW)

view more: next ›