The worst part of this for me is that none of them are even communist really, they just hate NATO and love modern day Russia for some weird reason?
Like I actually like the idea of proper commune style communism, being a fairly far left socialist (and also wanting to see the capitalist/imperial American system fall and/or replaced with something better). But none of these lot are actually communist in the slightest (as I said) they are literally just anti-west / pro-auth / pro-Russia people...
This "yogihos" cunt is the worst tankie of the lot ironically. And the lot of them are russian apologist morons or bots/agents. I would say defederate from them but I like to sometimes here this stupid views to give me some perspective
You mean they made Oppenheimer in real life after the film?? bruh
I seem to remember similar comments a year and a half ago...
Why, because you say so?
This is just being obtuse and a bit of a cunt. You can't expect not to have negative reprecusions as an affect of companies being allowed to just churn out as much AI generated shit as they can. Especially since you also say:
companies are already bound by lots of laws governing their behaviour and ultimately it's their behaviour that is what's important to control.
Please read what you've again but slowly this time. You're saying you're fine with all the other regulation, but it shouldn't be done here cause of individual liberties when i've clearly stated free use can be specifically allowed for here...
Yes, because that means I can also use it without limit.
You've again stated your problem when i've given a more than sensible solution. Individual free use is fine, why would anyone want to stop you, individually or even with your friends, being creative? The problems comes when companies with huge resources, influence, and nefarious motives decide to use it. How about this time we get ahead of it instead of letting things get out of control then trying to do something about it?
I mean there has to be a price to pay here, we can't have our cake and eat it unfortunately. Caveats like "individual use" could allow this type of use while prevent companies taking the piss.
You seem to be implying that the government is the ruling class too, which (I grant you) may at least in part be the case but at least they're voted into place. Would you rather have companies that we have no control over realistically use it without limit?
Honest question, what would you see as a fair way to handle the situation?
Sam Altman can go fuck himself. How the fuck is this a tool for humanity?? Like there aren't a million better ways to stop bots online. Don't feed us shit and call it chocolate, it's blatant he just wants to amass more data
I don't think it should be allowed to be trained off any of this stuff for entertainment/art/etc. at all. Like the dream future of AI was all the shitty boring stuff handled for us so we could sit back, chill and focus on arts, real scientific research, general individual betterment etc.
Instead we have these companies trying to get them doing all the art and interesting things whilst we all either have no job, money, or good standard of living, or the dangerous / shitty jobs.
I had a look. Yeah, it's transparent that they (whomever that may be in this case) did this one. But if anything PTSD makes me respect the guy way more.
Right? Like it seems this is a very bi-partisan effort that's moving surprisingly easy. What's the catch?
Yes, I expect much change in the house of commons as a result if this debate... /s
What the fuck is the point of these petitions anyways, never seen a single one amount to anything, and the moment they removed the ability to no confidence the PM via the petition it lost all potency.
If you're gonna have petitions make them proper, direct democracy style.
Hahaha, nein es ist der Kunstmuseum