als

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

I also have cls aliased to clear! I used to use windows terminal and found myself compulsively typing cls when I moved to linux.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

😱 a heavily advertised product turns out to be crappy in some way?! Colour me surprised

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

So about that "great replacement"

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago

He will any way. The courts and laws clearly mean nothing

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 weeks ago

Not liking a genocidal state is different to not liking Jewish people

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

Ah I hadn't heard about the signing issue as I use Linux. I used Brave for a few years but it's effectively just chrome with crypto ads and a homophobic CEO. I've heard good things about Zen but I've not personally tried it.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

LibreWolf has been nearly ideal for me

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

LibreWolf has been nearly ideal for me

 

The next season with our intrepid heroes premieres June 4th

 

way to make life less safe for everyone, idiots

 
 

From April 1st, water bills are rising … and so are we

Starmer and Reeves are siding with the private equity firms and hedge funds who own our water.

Together we’ll make the threat of mass, coordinated non-payment credible — and put this failed industry and government out of business.

31% price hike?

We pay ever-higher bills while water firms dump billions of litres of sewage in our rivers and seas – and hand billions of pounds to their shareholders.

But they are reliant on our compliance…

So what if we refuse to pay?

From the Poll Tax to Don’t Pay, refusing to pay en masse is a powerful act.

Right now, private water is vulnerable as the industry strains under a mountain of debt – if we act now, we can force the private profiteers out and take back our water.

Thousands have already joined

Starmer and Reeves are siding with the private equity firms and hedge funds who own our water, so we need many thousands more people to join us.

Through mass non-payment, we can protect each other from bill hikes, push back against greed of water bosses and put an end to this failing industry.

 

Quakers condemn police raid on Westminster Meeting House

Police broke into a Quaker Meeting House last night (27 March) and arrested six young people holding a meeting over concerns for the climate and Gaza.

Quakers in Britain strongly condemned the violation of their place of worship which they say is a direct result of stricter protest laws removing virtually all routes to challenge the status quo.

Just before 7.15pm more than 20 uniformed police, some equipped with tasers, forced their way into Westminster Meeting House.

They broke open the front door without warning or ringing the bell first, searching the whole building and arresting six women attending the meeting in a hired room.

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and the Public Order Act 2023 have criminalised many forms of protest and allow police to halt actions deemed too disruptive.

Meanwhile, changes in judicial procedures limit protesters' ability to defend their actions in court. All this means that there are fewer and fewer ways to speak truth to power.

Quakers support the right to nonviolent public protest, acting themselves from a deep moral imperative to stand up against injustice and for our planet.

Many have taken nonviolent direct action over the centuries from the abolition of slavery to women's suffrage and prison reform.

Paul Parker, recording clerk for Quakers in Britain, said: “No-one has been arrested in a Quaker meeting house in living memory.

“This aggressive violation of our place of worship and the forceful removal of young people holding a protest group meeting clearly shows what happens when a society criminalises protest.

“Freedom of speech, assembly, and fair trials are an essential part of free public debate which underpins democracy."

 

Police spent over £3m and deployed over 1,000 officers from nearly every force in the country in order to arrest 24 climate activists, Novara Media can reveal.

In August 2024, as the country was gripped by far-right riots, cops swooped on activists planning to hold a mass protest camp near Drax – a power station in north Yorkshire accused of greenwashing.

Police stopped vehicles heading for the camp and made arrests for “public order offences relating to interference with key national infrastructure”. They seized equipment such as compost toilets, wheelchair access ramps and camping equipment.

The protest camp, organised by campaign group Reclaim the Power, was to involve “six days of workshops, communal living and direct action to crash Drax’s profits”. Following the arrests, the camp was cancelled.

150 environmental organisations signed a statement accusing the police of acting as “private security” for Drax, while activists said the sting showed the police had the wrong priorities.

A spokesperson for Reclaim the Power said: “In Yorkshire this morning, police prioritised locating and arresting people suspected of organising peaceful protest with tents, toilets and track for wheelchairs over locating and arresting people who are actually organising far-right riots.”

15 of those arrested face plea hearing at Leeds magistrates court on Thursday, charged with conspiracy to lock on. They deny the charges.

A freedom of information (FOI) request shared with Novara Media can now reveal the scale and cost of the operation.

1,070 officers were deployed during Operation Infusion – the codename for the operation. This includes 334 from North Yorkshire Police, 100 from Police Scotland and 57 from the Metropolitan Police. Officers from 39 police forces were involved in the operation – nearly every constabulary in the country.

North Yorkshire Police used contractors to provide accommodation, vehicle hire, hire of portaloos, carparking, skips and fencing. The names of the contractors were exempted from the FOI request. The total cost of the operation was £3,168,432.

Kevin Blowe, campaigns coordinator at the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol), said: “The scale of the police operation shows how much money the police are willing to throw at shutting down a protest before it even takes place.”

In July 2024, Drax had secured an injunction which created a “buffer zone” against the threat of direct action protests around its north Yorkshire power plant. The plant has been a magnet for protesters for years, with previous protests against Drax infiltrated by undercover police officers.

Some of the arrests in August were made for conspiracy to “lock on” – when protesters attach themselves to people or buildings making it difficult to remove them. “Locking on” was specifically criminalised for the first time by the Public Order Act 2023, brought in by the Conservative government which cited “groups such as Just Stop Oil and Insulate Britain” to justify its crackdown on protest.

Blowe said: “In 2024 there was a marked rise in the use of conspiracy charges to arrest campaigners for the newly introduced or expanded offences included in recent anti-protest legislation. Invariably this is because they were associated with groups targeted for ongoing police surveillance.”

Blowe is the author of a forthcoming report which claims that aggressive policing and the portrayal of protesters as threats to democracy has grown so routine and so severe that it amounts to state repression. He said: “Events at Drax last summer are one of the reasons why, for the first time, we are calling this state repression: measures to disproportionately deter, disrupt, punish or otherwise control protesters, campaign groups and entire social movements, with a total disregard for their human rights.”

A spokesperson for North Yorkshire Police said: “Whilst part of our role is to facilitate peaceful protest, we also have a responsibility to minimise disruption and prevent a breach of the peace.

“There is an ongoing court case relating to the operation in question, so it would be therefore inappropriate to comment further at this time.”

Drax used to be the UK’s biggest coal fired power station. It has transitioned to use what the company claims is “sustainable bioenergy”, but it has been found to burn wood from “old-growth” forests, pumping huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It has also been accused of “environmental racism” as its toxic wood processing plants are mostly based in poor communities of colour in the southern United States.

In February, the government extended subsidies for Drax until 2031 to the dismay of environmentalists and communities in the southern United States.

Simon Childs is a commissioning editor and reporter for Novara Media.

 

Police spent over £3m and deployed over 1,000 officers from nearly every force in the country in order to arrest 24 climate activists, Novara Media can reveal.

In August 2024, as the country was gripped by far-right riots, cops swooped on activists planning to hold a mass protest camp near Drax – a power station in north Yorkshire accused of greenwashing.

Police stopped vehicles heading for the camp and made arrests for “public order offences relating to interference with key national infrastructure”. They seized equipment such as compost toilets, wheelchair access ramps and camping equipment.

The protest camp, organised by campaign group Reclaim the Power, was to involve “six days of workshops, communal living and direct action to crash Drax’s profits”. Following the arrests, the camp was cancelled.

150 environmental organisations signed a statement accusing the police of acting as “private security” for Drax, while activists said the sting showed the police had the wrong priorities.

A spokesperson for Reclaim the Power said: “In Yorkshire this morning, police prioritised locating and arresting people suspected of organising peaceful protest with tents, toilets and track for wheelchairs over locating and arresting people who are actually organising far-right riots.”

15 of those arrested face plea hearing at Leeds magistrates court on Thursday, charged with conspiracy to lock on. They deny the charges.

A freedom of information (FOI) request shared with Novara Media can now reveal the scale and cost of the operation.

1,070 officers were deployed during Operation Infusion – the codename for the operation. This includes 334 from North Yorkshire Police, 100 from Police Scotland and 57 from the Metropolitan Police. Officers from 39 police forces were involved in the operation – nearly every constabulary in the country.

North Yorkshire Police used contractors to provide accommodation, vehicle hire, hire of portaloos, carparking, skips and fencing. The names of the contractors were exempted from the FOI request. The total cost of the operation was £3,168,432.

Kevin Blowe, campaigns coordinator at the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol), said: “The scale of the police operation shows how much money the police are willing to throw at shutting down a protest before it even takes place.”

In July 2024, Drax had secured an injunction which created a “buffer zone” against the threat of direct action protests around its north Yorkshire power plant. The plant has been a magnet for protesters for years, with previous protests against Drax infiltrated by undercover police officers.

Some of the arrests in August were made for conspiracy to “lock on” – when protesters attach themselves to people or buildings making it difficult to remove them. “Locking on” was specifically criminalised for the first time by the Public Order Act 2023, brought in by the Conservative government which cited “groups such as Just Stop Oil and Insulate Britain” to justify its crackdown on protest.

Blowe said: “In 2024 there was a marked rise in the use of conspiracy charges to arrest campaigners for the newly introduced or expanded offences included in recent anti-protest legislation. Invariably this is because they were associated with groups targeted for ongoing police surveillance.”

Blowe is the author of a forthcoming report which claims that aggressive policing and the portrayal of protesters as threats to democracy has grown so routine and so severe that it amounts to state repression. He said: “Events at Drax last summer are one of the reasons why, for the first time, we are calling this state repression: measures to disproportionately deter, disrupt, punish or otherwise control protesters, campaign groups and entire social movements, with a total disregard for their human rights.”

A spokesperson for North Yorkshire Police said: “Whilst part of our role is to facilitate peaceful protest, we also have a responsibility to minimise disruption and prevent a breach of the peace.

“There is an ongoing court case relating to the operation in question, so it would be therefore inappropriate to comment further at this time.”

Drax used to be the UK’s biggest coal fired power station. It has transitioned to use what the company claims is “sustainable bioenergy”, but it has been found to burn wood from “old-growth” forests, pumping huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It has also been accused of “environmental racism” as its toxic wood processing plants are mostly based in poor communities of colour in the southern United States.

In February, the government extended subsidies for Drax until 2031 to the dismay of environmentalists and communities in the southern United States.

Simon Childs is a commissioning editor and reporter for Novara Media.

 
 

crosspost from !news@lemmy.world

Summary

Wisconsin resident Bradley Bartell voted for Trump’s promise to crack down on “criminal illegal immigrants,” but now his Peruvian wife Camila Muñoz has been detained by ICE.

Muñoz, from Peru, overstayed her visa but had applied for legal residency. On their way home from a honeymoon, immigration agents detained her at a Puerto Rico airport.

Despite no criminal record, she remains in a Louisiana detention center. Her case reflects ICE’s broadened enforcement that now includes documented immigrants.

Bartell, once supportive of stricter immigration policies, now questions the impact on families like his own.

 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›