albert180

joined 2 days ago
[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 6 hours ago

East Germany doing East Germany things.

I mean they also don't believe the normal media anymore. They will just parrot what Putins Propaganda spoonfeeds them in their Telegram Groups and "Alternative Media"

There has also been hostility towards journalists over the past few days, especially after some 2,000 people joined a protest by the far right in Magdeburg on Saturday night. The Association of German Journalists said there had been aggression and threats against the press and appealed for greater police protection.

Those people and areas are a lost cause.

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 hours ago

Same

But there are a Lot of people Out there WHO pay 15$ for YouTube Premium, If you can get way better content for that Money elsewhere

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Unless they monetize the wanted Features Like Ad-Blocking. 10$/Month for No Ads everywhere is a Deal that many people would probably Take. Sponsorblock, DeArrow, Video Background Player Fix, there are many QoL Improvements that a Browser Company might include to sell a Browser Subscription or likewise

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 16 hours ago

The Reputation comes from people who have never tried it and are looking for an excuse why they don't use it.

It's Not more complicated than E-Mail

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 16 hours ago

You can cancel Billing Agreements in PayPal. It's quite convenient

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 16 hours ago

Then they will Switch to another Browser, or there will be a drop-In replacement for Electron.

It's Not that hard for the developers to Block Chrome then

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 16 hours ago

How is Manifest v3, Fingerprinting and the proposed "Web Integrity API" not enshittification?

They would have gone even further with this, if Firefox wouldn't exist. And Firefox is on life Support, because they can't afford for it to Go away otherwise they would have the Antitrust regulators Breathing down their neck

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

but it’s hard to see any of them becoming well-developed and trustworthy for things like health data, government services, financial transactions &etc anytime soon.

I honestly don't See the Relation to Chrome.

You're suggesting that a PWA running on Firefox isn't suitable for this?

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

No, not every company can afford to Bulldoze the competition in the Browser Market because they have indefinite deep pockets from the Ad Business.

If that unfair advantage goes away there will be more competition again in the Browser Segment .

Also Marketshare can grow and shrink quick

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 18 hours ago (9 children)

Google can Set Standards to their own Advantage, e.g. with regards to Tracking which reinforces their Monopoly on Things Like Ads, the Same reason they crippled all the AdBlockers with ManifestV3 on Chromium-based Browsers

And the only alternative that isn't Chromium-based is Firefox. (Or Safari with WebKit). All other Browsers use Chromium

So it would be really good for everyone if they were forced to sell Chrome

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 22 hours ago

It's possible, but Not necessary. The Plugin includes a client

[–] albert180@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But they include it, as I've written it 🙄

(They pool multiple shadow libraries)

view more: next ›