Soyweiser

joined 2 years ago
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Windsurf?

Moat?

The descent into jargon.

(Also the rest is just lol, people scaring themselves).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

swallows thesaurus

Art

E: Anybody have that tweet ready on how some men when disagreed with suddenly turn into 18th century noblemen or something? Forsooth!

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Remember the old facebook created two ai models to try and help trading? Which turned quickly into gibberish (for us) as a trading language. They uses repetition of words to indicate how much they wanted an object. So if it valued balls highly it would just repeat ball a few dozen times like that.

Id figure that is what is causing the repeats here, and not the anthropomorphized idea lf it is screaming. Prob just a way those kinds of systems work. But no of course they all jump to consciousness and pain.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Shielded from people with these kinds of debates would affect, it is all just entertainment for them, and it is very important that their 'this feels logically inconsistent' is validated with people agreeing with them that it is logically inconsistent. And they think that when people go 'wtf is wrong with you' this actually means they are logically right and they feel superior. I blame youtube for this specific fall of Rome (I'm joking, this is just a big example of it, and it lead to a few of his fans spread over the internet to try and debate that shit (which via the 'wtf is wrong with you' method above prob lead to them to getting further into debate culture using a similar method as religious cults going door to door)).

E: this is in addition to what Amoeba Girl said btw. Some of them just want "economic prisoners with jobs" to code for them

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"what is the legal proof" brother in javascript, please talk to a lawyer.

E: so many people posting like the past 30 years didnt happen. I know they are not going to go as hard after google as they went after the piratebay but still.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 2 weeks ago

AI x-risk obsession also has a lot of elements about concept of intelligence as IQ and how bigger is better and stuff like that in it, which nowadays also has a bit of a right coded slant to it. (even if intelligence/self awareness/etc isn't needed for an AGI x-risk, I have read Peter Watts).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ow yes, I was mad at the 'they can't help it, it was the ambien' style people.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

He was a pos before the K. Lets not blame innocent drugs. Just as autism didnt turn him into a nazi.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

A while back they found a trick to make sure a person using a vpn routed all their traffic via a controlled server, wonder if that got fixed.

Here: https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/05/novel-attack-against-virtually-all-vpn-apps-neuters-their-entire-purpose/

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 11 points 3 weeks ago

Going to write an llm that in 5% of the cases tell people asking the question 'no' or starts to argue with them. Just to mess with the "it is self aware" people.

(Im kidding here, it would ruin those peoples mental health, and as people would not believe you after you reveal the trick (see ELIZA), it would make our own lives worse).

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course he is. It is me, im Yudocus.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 18 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

To be clear, I would be impressed with a dog that wrote the same story, but only because it was a dog.

Lol

view more: ‹ prev next ›