The zombies from PvZ were a metaphor. Yes, including the Elvis Presley zombie.
Samsuma
joined 3 years ago
Not to mention that within the entity itself, you'll find out that a lot of them are actually Americans if not European lol
I don't understand, what's your point? Why would a settler-colonial entity want to stop another settler-colonial entity from continuing to erase an entire population and exert its influence on the region on top of stealing its resources? It doesn't because it's not in its current interest to do so.
Israel assigned a Zionist as the US Lebanese ambassador and is actively trying to start a civil war in Lebanon.
This wouldn't have been possible (at best, it'd be difficult) had the US and the remaining West not continued their unimpeded financial, military, etc.. support for the genocidal entity, though. It's not referred to as the "51st state" or the "unsinkable aircraft carrier" for no reason. All of the other reasons here are in line with the US' interests anyway, I don't see how they suggest the U.S. being the "subservient" one.
The US can order the entity to a "complete cease-fire" on a whim with a single phone call. If that's not emblematic of the clear-in-place Father-Son relationship, then I don't know what is.
How?
Yes yes, we've already went over this, my opinions are quite heavy to read. Anyways, there's no rule that says you should be verbose to be able to explain the sort of “good faith” statements you had in mind on the topic of Team Blue and Team Red (unless that's a cult-like behavior from Reddit carried on here? Who knows).
In fact, if you're able to explain in simple terms, then there should be no problem explaining, so knock yourself out. What sort of “good faith” statements did you have in mind on the topic of Team Blue and Team Red?
red variety: "yes actually we are racist and actually hate your guts"
blue: "yes but no but actually but maybe, perhaps, mayhaps, blue eyes, whataboutism, consider the alternative, juxtapose this to that, for instance, in short, in closing, blonde hair matters"
Yes my posts pack quite the punch for bloodthirsty libs like you hiding behind a "goodwill" veneer who certainly care about building communities (but not for anyone outside of their KKKlub), thank you for noticing.
Anyways, that's enough sidetracking, let's try this once again: tell us, what sort of “good faith” statements did you have in mind on the topic of Team Blue and Team Red?
So brave. Tell us, what sort of "good faith" statements did you have in mind on the topic of Team Blue and Team Red's consensus on genocide, bombing campaigns, scapegoating foreigners, violating students for holding thoughts that go against the interests of the empire (whether via abduction through the ICE, by direct police brutality or through deportation), violating land rights to the Native Americans, continuing slavery, whether via salary theft, student debts, healthcare debts, or via prison slaves (as it is literally enshrined in the constitution)?
We arent going to stop Israel either way
I'm going to have to stop reading from here, I skimmed through 5 times anyways and couldn't get any semblance of a coherent point. Clearly you don't actually care about the marginalized groups you speak of, otherwise you would've understood why nobody takes your Western "democracy" seriously, you just continue to come off as the "I can't be a genocide-loving Islamophobe, I have an Arab friend" type (or similar).
No amount of pearl clutching will wash away your depravity.
The quote thing has been aptly noted by another user here already, actually. Have a look, it'll knock your lib socks right off:
https://lemmy.ml/post/29464508/18359532
Here's another instance of Bernie saying the quote:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/11/28/bernie_sanders_israel_has_a_right_to_defend_itself_but_not_to_kill_12000_innocent_people_in_response.html
Anything before or after that quote is to be understood as pure pearl-clutching/handwringing from a both-sideser.
Which part of the image is wrong (which by the looks of it, you're conflating "wrong"/"incorrect" with the word "propaganda" ) or "intellectually lazy", again?