No clue the details, looked it up out of curiosity when I had the same question as you but didn’t read it
PixelPlumber
Tsundere who vents the dere by speaking in her native language.
MC understands Russian, unknown to her.
Glad to help, I think most here were confused because there’s otherwise no issue with oathbreaker subclass and murder lol
You got me curious enough to try to understand the mechanics of what you mean, since I thought if you already were oathbreaker there’s no problem
I see one post from someone saying the oathbreaker knight can aggro you, depending on which camp you rest at. Most will be fine, but some place the knight close enough to be angry
Is that your issue?
It’s not ideal in a few ways, but I think the bigger thing here is at least one employee is willing to risk their job to prove that they agree with her and use the recording as identity proof
I agree with almost everything hog say, and strongly think WFH is the future and worth the costs.
But I think physical security concerns are a fair one for some companies to hold for WFH, if they handle sensitive data where leaking is a concern.
https://www.reddit.com/r/OLED_Gaming/comments/xsqj7l/psa_if_you_have_nvidia_geforce_experience_ingame/ seems to be the root cause- removing all controllers makes things better
Ah gotcha. Will be home soon to try that.
What I find silly is that Linux has no problem handling it :(. Trying to use that more and more, with the lack of hdr being the last holdout
Oh just to be clear, I don’t mean like the monitor has power, I mean windows is wanting to display it’s fancy Lock Screen at all times. I’ll still try that, if it makes a difference this is an Alienware.
That’s true, I just wonder if open source changes anything, legally. Unless one term of the breakup is “will not contribute to chromium”
I think the poster is making a good point though- In this split, google the advertising company can freely contribute to the open source chromium. You need some model that leads the chromium maintainer to reject changes like this.
A public statement “z is detained for y” is generally expected compared to the usual “no one has seen x from china lately, they probably got held by the govt”