OpenStars

joined 6 days ago
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

John Olivier (of Last Week Tonight) has an interesting video showing how those checks automatically sent out did some active harm in some cases.

Mind you, this is after government was defunded for decades, thus offering strong "who killed hannibal" vibes.

img

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I had loads of communication problems trying to use Voyager on Android - I wonder if it was b/c it may not work as well for non-Lemmy.World accounts? (the one I tried to have it work with was on Discuss.Online) Like I would reply to someone but not be able to see my reply, or receive a notification and not be able to see their message to me, and refreshing did not work, nor did simply waiting minutes of time, though force-quitting the app and reloading always did.

Now I switched to PieFed so it doesn't matter, but basically I think you have to just download apps and try them until you find one you like b/c there's always going to be something.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

Months ago was the time to make changes. Yeah, that's what they said then too, except it was wrong then, as proven by the fact that the changes did happen.

Even if the words sound similar, now really is different than then. Voting has already begun - the fight to pick candidacies is long over and done. It is now long past time to pick a side.

If you want to vote 3rd party then go ahead - nobody is stopping you. Aside from all the news about some 3rd-party candidates receiving money from and having demonstrated ties to Russia (look it up if you haven't heard), the Democrats do not seem to be taking such rhetoric as a credible "threat" though, for whatever reason. Probably bc they really are the best hope for the Palestinian people, as the latter recently confirmed by putting out a statement saying why they finally chose to endorse Kamala Harris's campaign. You can ofc accuse the Dems of being very naive and disconnected from their voting base - that would be extremely difficult to argue against - and yet facts are facts.

See e.g. this article: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/17919598.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Hehehe, boy are you in for a treat!

https://www.homestuck.com/stories

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How though? And more importantly, why? Like, what "leeway" does Kamala have to say anything different than she already has, which she could shift to?

Maybe after she wins yes, but at this point the choices are Trump vs. not-Trump, so I don't see how a vote for a third-party would help in this case. At one point, with Bernie Sanders vs. Hillary Clinton there were different thoughts about how a vote for Bernie would cause Hillary to shift more towards the left - but most of that again gets back to the nomination process, not the final show-down between the two parties, and after that was a disastrous example of how voting for the 3rd-party candidate didn't help the democratic party shift, except in the sense that it handed literally hundreds and hundreds of judicial nominees to the Republican party that, among other things, ended the protections of Roe v. Wade.

Two months ago the situation with Biden was VERY DIFFERENT than the situation now faced, with Kamala. Back then we could - and yay, did! - shift and pivot to adjust to the harsh realities that he was not capable of running again. We very likely would have lost if he had. But that was then, and this is now.

Anyway I think that I'm preaching to the converted here, so maybe I just misunderstood something that you said. Tbh, I don't agree with your take on the OP - I think it really does show voting not for a 3rd party but voting for the other side b/c "bOtH sIdEs ArE tHe SaMe" (the title of the post), specifically wrt genocide. I think that b/c there are only 2 tracks shown... Also, the genocide being mentioned implicitly in the graphic ("but worse...") shows how its focus is on short-term effects immediately after the election, not long-term ones about telling the Democratic party how the American populace would very much enjoy it if it would become more liberal if they would please and thank you very much.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

@petrescatraian@libranet.de

Yay - winter is coming!

img

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I believe they call that "distinguished" now - as compared to whatever the fuck is going on with Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, and Elon Musk who we now are aware can jump a whole entire 3 inches off the ground.

img

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 41 points 3 days ago

There are multiple whole entire industries dedicated to fleecing such individuals. Health care in the USA for one... Donald Trump's campaign to name another...

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago

They lived in a different time period. Climate change hadn't already happened yet, and the USA especially was sitting on top of the world, as the rest of it had been if not quite decimated then at least heavily damaged by all the bombing from WWII. And we were a socialist nation! Schools, roads, bridges, a fully functioning post office, and so much more. The top marginal tax rate was ~90% and... well anyway.

So yeah, like the Kings of Old, they accumulated "stuff". It made sense to them at the time. Surely nothing would ever like... "change" or anything like that, would it? And they even okayed the dismantling of things like social security, and maintenance of infrastructure - so long as such did not directly impact themselves, it's all good, right? So long as women also lose bodily autonomy, anything that went along with that is A-okay, r-r-right?!

On the bright side, do younger people have less stress, knowing that they don't have to save up for retirement, bc they'll surely die sooner than it would be able to keep up with anyway? Especially with inflation like we've seen lately?

Anyway that was quite a tangent wasn't it? TLDR: people's lives are so very different now, and look to remain that way permanently. And not just in the USA, but due to Brexit, in the UK too. Disinformation campaigns are strikingly effective.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The last I looked it was white cis het men whinging about being the latest "minority" group, and "alphas". Extra bonus points for being older but with a new account you will be locked out of that (and due to climate change, possibly forever).

img

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

I thought that was Mikey-D's?

img

Phew, thank goodness I was wrong:-).

img 2

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Um... so then if they serve "fish sticks" then...

Nvm, I don't think I want to know!?😅

view more: ‹ prev next ›